- A
Apply a CanNotDelete lock to the production resource group.
Why wrong: A lock can protect resources from deletion, but it does not add or correct tags. It does not meet the cost-tracking requirement.
- B
Assign a modify policy for CostCenter=PRD at the production resource group scope and create a remediation task.
A modify policy can add or correct the tag without blocking deployment, which matches the business requirement. Assigning it at the resource-group scope limits the effect to only that production workload, and remediation updates existing resources so both old and new items converge on the same tag value.
- C
Assign Contributor on the subscription and require teams to enter the tag manually.
Why wrong: Contributor only grants permissions; it does not enforce consistent tagging. Manual entry also creates drift and depends on user discipline, which the business specifically wants to avoid.
- D
Set the tag on the management group and expect all resources to inherit it automatically.
Why wrong: Management groups do not natively behave like tag templates for resources. A tag set there will not automatically flow to every resource in the way this requirement needs.
Automatically Apply Tags to Azure Resources Without Blocking Deployments
This AZ-104 practice question tests your understanding of manage azure identities and governance. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A finance team wants every resource created in one production resource group to carry CostCenter=PRD automatically. They do not want deployments blocked if a team forgets the tag, but they do want existing resources and future resources in that resource group to converge on the correct tag value. What should the administrator configure?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Assign a modify policy for CostCenter=PRD at the production resource group scope and create a remediation task.
Option B is correct because Azure Policy with a 'modify' effect can automatically add or correct the CostCenter tag on resources within the specified scope. By assigning the policy at the production resource group scope and creating a remediation task, the policy will audit existing resources and, via a managed identity, apply the tag value to non-compliant resources without blocking deployment. This satisfies the requirement for automatic convergence without preventing creation if the tag is missing.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Apply a CanNotDelete lock to the production resource group.
Why it's wrong here
A lock can protect resources from deletion, but it does not add or correct tags. It does not meet the cost-tracking requirement.
When this WOULD be correct
An administrator needs to prevent accidental deletion of critical resources in a resource group, regardless of tag compliance. The question would specify that tag enforcement is not required, only protection against deletion.
- ✓
Assign a modify policy for CostCenter=PRD at the production resource group scope and create a remediation task.
Why this is correct
A modify policy can add or correct the tag without blocking deployment, which matches the business requirement. Assigning it at the resource-group scope limits the effect to only that production workload, and remediation updates existing resources so both old and new items converge on the same tag value.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Assign Contributor on the subscription and require teams to enter the tag manually.
Why it's wrong here
Contributor only grants permissions; it does not enforce consistent tagging. Manual entry also creates drift and depends on user discipline, which the business specifically wants to avoid.
When this WOULD be correct
This option would be correct if the requirement was to delegate tagging responsibility to teams with appropriate permissions, without any automatic enforcement or remediation. For example, if the question stated 'Teams must be able to assign tags themselves, but there is no requirement for automatic tagging or remediation.'
- ✗
Set the tag on the management group and expect all resources to inherit it automatically.
Why it's wrong here
Management groups do not natively behave like tag templates for resources. A tag set there will not automatically flow to every resource in the way this requirement needs.
When this WOULD be correct
This would be correct if the question asked about applying an Azure Policy (e.g., 'inherit a tag from the resource group if missing') at the management group scope, which can enforce tag inheritance via policy, not by simply setting a tag on the management group.
Option-by-option analysis
Why each answer is right or wrong
Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The AZ-104 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.
✓Assign a modify policy for CostCenter=PRD at the production resource group scope and create a remediation task.Correct answer▾
Why this is correct
A modify policy can add or correct the tag without blocking deployment, which matches the business requirement. Assigning it at the resource-group scope limits the effect to only that production workload, and remediation updates existing resources so both old and new items converge on the same tag value.
✗Apply a CanNotDelete lock to the production resource group.Wrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
A CanNotDelete lock prevents resource deletion but does not enforce or propagate tags. It does not automatically add or correct tags on existing or new resources.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
An administrator needs to prevent accidental deletion of critical resources in a resource group, regardless of tag compliance. The question would specify that tag enforcement is not required, only protection against deletion.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may confuse locks with governance controls, thinking a lock can enforce tag values, or they may misread the requirement as preventing deletion of untagged resources.
✗Assign Contributor on the subscription and require teams to enter the tag manually.Wrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
Assigning Contributor at the subscription level does not enforce automatic tagging; it only grants permissions. Teams could still forget to add the tag manually, and there is no mechanism to remediate existing resources or enforce convergence.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
This option would be correct if the requirement was to delegate tagging responsibility to teams with appropriate permissions, without any automatic enforcement or remediation. For example, if the question stated 'Teams must be able to assign tags themselves, but there is no requirement for automatic tagging or remediation.'
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may think that granting Contributor role allows administrators to enforce tagging through permissions, but they overlook that Contributor does not automatically apply tags or remediate non-compliant resources.
✗Set the tag on the management group and expect all resources to inherit it automatically.Wrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
Tags set on a management group are not inherited by resources in child resource groups; inheritance only applies to policies and RBAC, not tags. Therefore, this option would not automatically apply the CostCenter tag to resources.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
This would be correct if the question asked about applying an Azure Policy (e.g., 'inherit a tag from the resource group if missing') at the management group scope, which can enforce tag inheritance via policy, not by simply setting a tag on the management group.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may mistakenly believe that tags set at higher scopes (management group) automatically propagate to lower scopes (resource groups and resources), similar to how RBAC or policy assignments inherit.
Analysis generated from the official AZ-104blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is confusing Azure Policy's 'modify' effect (which allows non-blocking correction) with 'deny' or 'append' effects (which block or add without remediation), or assuming that tags on management groups automatically propagate to resources, which they do not.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
The 'modify' effect in Azure Policy uses a remediation task that leverages a system-assigned managed identity to update existing resources. The policy definition must include a 'condition' to detect non-compliance (e.g., missing or incorrect CostCenter tag) and a 'details' block specifying the tag name and value. Remediation tasks can be triggered manually or on a schedule, and they operate asynchronously, ensuring convergence without blocking new deployments (which would occur with 'deny' or 'append' effects).
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A startup's cloud architect reviews their monthly bill and notices costs are higher than expected for a long-running batch job. Switching from on-demand instances to Reserved Instances — or using Spot/Preemptible VMs — can reduce compute costs by up to 72 %. Questions like this test whether you understand the tradeoffs between commitment, flexibility, and cost across cloud pricing models.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Manage Azure Identities and Governance — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Manage Azure Identities and Governance practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All AZ-104 questions
1,170 questions across all exam domains
- →
AZ-104 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
AZ-104 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related AZ-104 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Manage Azure Identities and Governance practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to Manage Azure Identities and Governance.
Implement and Manage Storage practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to Implement and Manage Storage.
Deploy and Manage Azure Compute practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to Deploy and Manage Azure Compute.
Implement and Manage Virtual Networking practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to Implement and Manage Virtual Networking.
Monitor and Maintain Azure Resources practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to Monitor and Maintain Azure Resources.
AZ-104 Azure RBAC practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to AZ-104 Azure RBAC.
AZ-104 storage account practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to AZ-104 storage account.
AZ-104 virtual network practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to AZ-104 virtual network.
AZ-104 NSG practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to AZ-104 NSG.
AZ-104 Azure Monitor practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to AZ-104 Azure Monitor.
AZ-104 backup practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to AZ-104 backup.
AZ-104 managed identity practice questions
Practise AZ-104 questions linked to AZ-104 managed identity.
Practice this exam
Start a free AZ-104 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this AZ-104 question test?
Manage Azure Identities and Governance — This question tests Manage Azure Identities and Governance — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Assign a modify policy for CostCenter=PRD at the production resource group scope and create a remediation task. — Option B is correct because Azure Policy with a 'modify' effect can automatically add or correct the CostCenter tag on resources within the specified scope. By assigning the policy at the production resource group scope and creating a remediation task, the policy will audit existing resources and, via a managed identity, apply the tag value to non-compliant resources without blocking deployment. This satisfies the requirement for automatic convergence without preventing creation if the tag is missing.
What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more ways this is tested on AZ-104
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Finance wants every resource created in one production resource group to receive the tag CostCenter=FINSVC automatically, but deployments should not be blocked if a template omits the tag. Existing resources should be updated when possible. Which two actions should the administrator take? Select two.
medium- ✓ A.Assign a Modify policy that adds or updates the CostCenter tag.
- ✓ B.Run a remediation task for noncompliant existing resources.
- C.Apply a ReadOnly lock to the resource group to keep tags consistent.
- D.Assign Reader to the resource group to ensure tag visibility.
- E.Use only an Audit policy so teams can see missing tags.
Why A: Option A is correct because a Modify effect policy definition can automatically add or update the CostCenter tag on resources during creation or update, without blocking deployments if the tag is missing. This satisfies the requirement that deployments should not be blocked, as the Modify effect only applies the tag rather than denying non-compliant requests.
Keep practising
More AZ-104 practice questions
- A storage automation service principal must upload, read, and delete blob data in one container by using Microsoft Entra…
- A subnet contains several application servers. You need to allow inbound TCP 3389 only from a management subnet named Su…
- A subscription admin wants to investigate who changed a resource and also review the platform-generated events for that…
- Based on the exhibit, which Azure feature should the administrator use to track this kind of platform-wide service issue…
- An administrator wants a script running on an Azure VM to create a resource in Azure without storing any passwords or cl…
- A PowerShell script runs on an Azure VM every night and uses Azure CLI commands to create tags and VM resources in anoth…
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This AZ-104 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-104 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.