Question 866 of 1,170
Manage Azure Identities and GovernancemediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Assign Reader Role at Management Group Scope

This AZ-104 practice question tests your understanding of manage azure identities and governance. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An enterprise uses one management group to contain five subscriptions for a business unit. A compliance auditor in an Entra ID group needs read-only access to every current and future resource in all five subscriptions, but must not see resources in other business units. What is the best scope for the Reader role assignment?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Assign Reader at the management group that contains the five subscriptions.

Assigning the Reader role at the management group scope grants inherited read-only access to all current and future resources within every subscription under that management group, while preventing access to resources in other business units that are in separate management groups. This satisfies the auditor's requirement for a single, scalable assignment that automatically covers new subscriptions added to the management group.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Assign Reader at the management group that contains the five subscriptions.

    Why this is correct

    This scope lets the role flow downward to all subscriptions, resource groups, and resources under that management group. It is the narrowest place that still covers every current and future subscription in that business unit. The auditor gets consistent read-only visibility without requiring separate assignments for each subscription, and access stays isolated from other management groups.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Assign Reader separately at each subscription in the business unit.

    Why it's wrong here

    This would provide the needed access, but only after creating and maintaining multiple assignments. It does not take advantage of inheritance from the parent container, so future subscriptions would require manual work. The requirement asks for the best scope, not just a workable one.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the requirement was to grant read-only access only to specific existing subscriptions without any future subscriptions, or if the management group was not used and subscriptions were managed independently, then assigning Reader at each subscription would be appropriate.

  • Assign Reader at a single resource group within one subscription.

    Why it's wrong here

    A resource group scope is too narrow because it only covers resources inside that one group. The auditor would miss resources in other resource groups and other subscriptions. This does not satisfy the need for organization-wide visibility across the business unit.

    When this WOULD be correct

    This option would be correct if the question required granting read-only access only to resources within a specific resource group, not across multiple subscriptions or management groups.

  • Assign Reader directly to each resource that the auditor should see.

    Why it's wrong here

    Per-resource assignments are operationally expensive and easy to miss. They do not scale to all current and future resources in five subscriptions. This approach also creates unnecessary administrative overhead compared with inheritance from the management group.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the requirement were to grant read-only access only to a specific set of existing resources (e.g., a few VMs) with no need for future resources or subscription-wide access, then assigning Reader at the resource level would be appropriate.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The AZ-104 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Assign Reader at the management group that contains the five subscriptions.Correct answer

Why this is correct

This scope lets the role flow downward to all subscriptions, resource groups, and resources under that management group. It is the narrowest place that still covers every current and future subscription in that business unit. The auditor gets consistent read-only visibility without requiring separate assignments for each subscription, and access stays isolated from other management groups.

Assign Reader separately at each subscription in the business unit.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Assigning Reader at each subscription separately does not cover future resources in new subscriptions added to the management group, violating the requirement for access to all current and future resources.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the requirement was to grant read-only access only to specific existing subscriptions without any future subscriptions, or if the management group was not used and subscriptions were managed independently, then assigning Reader at each subscription would be appropriate.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think that assigning at the subscription level is sufficient and simpler, not realizing that management group assignment provides inheritance to future subscriptions and reduces administrative overhead.

Assign Reader at a single resource group within one subscription.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Assigning Reader at a single resource group would not grant access to all resources across five subscriptions, failing the requirement for read-only access to every current and future resource in all five subscriptions.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

This option would be correct if the question required granting read-only access only to resources within a specific resource group, not across multiple subscriptions or management groups.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think that assigning at a resource group is sufficient because it covers resources within that group, overlooking the need for broader scope across multiple subscriptions.

Assign Reader directly to each resource that the auditor should see.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Assigning Reader directly to each resource is impractical and does not scale; it fails to cover future resources and violates the requirement for read-only access to all current and future resources across five subscriptions.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the requirement were to grant read-only access only to a specific set of existing resources (e.g., a few VMs) with no need for future resources or subscription-wide access, then assigning Reader at the resource level would be appropriate.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think that assigning the role directly to each resource provides precise control and ensures the auditor sees only intended resources, overlooking the management group's ability to inherit permissions and cover future resources.

Analysis generated from the official AZ-104blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may think subscription-level assignments are necessary for granularity, overlooking that management group scope provides inheritance to all current and future subscriptions and resources within that group, which is the most efficient and correct approach for multi-subscription governance.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Azure RBAC supports role assignments at four scopes: management group, subscription, resource group, and resource. Assignments at a higher scope are inherited by all child scopes, so a Reader assignment at the management group level propagates to all subscriptions, resource groups, and resources within that management group. This design aligns with Azure's hierarchical governance model, where management groups enable policy and access control aggregation across multiple subscriptions for a business unit.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free AZ-104 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Manage Azure Identities and Governance — This question tests Manage Azure Identities and Governance — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Assign Reader at the management group that contains the five subscriptions. — Assigning the Reader role at the management group scope grants inherited read-only access to all current and future resources within every subscription under that management group, while preventing access to resources in other business units that are in separate management groups. This satisfies the auditor's requirement for a single, scalable assignment that automatically covers new subscriptions added to the management group.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on AZ-104

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A cloud operations team in the Corp business unit needs to read all Azure resources in every current and future subscription under the Corp management group to prepare monthly governance reports. They must not gain access to subscriptions that belong to other business units. What scope should the administrator use when assigning the Reader role?

medium
  • A.Subscription scope
  • B.Resource group scope
  • C.Management group scope
  • D.Resource scope

Why C: The Reader role assigned at the management group scope grants read-only access to all subscriptions within that management group, including future subscriptions, because Azure RBAC permissions are inherited by child resources. This meets the requirement to cover all current and future subscriptions under the Corp management group while excluding subscriptions in other business units.

Keep practising

More AZ-104 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This AZ-104 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-104 exam.