An administrator configures a security policy with a custom application definition that matches TCP port 8080. When testing the policy, traffic on port 8080 is matched, but the application identification engine flags the traffic as 'junos-http'. What is the reason for this behavior?
Trap 1: The default policy evaluation order places global policies above…
Incorrect. Evaluation order does not alter protocol signature recognition.
Trap 2: Custom applications are disabled by default when security policies…
Incorrect. Custom applications are fully functional if properly defined.
Trap 3: The security policy must be changed from zone-based to global to…
Incorrect. Scope (zone vs global) does not alter AppID evaluation priority over port definitions.
- A
The default policy evaluation order places global policies above custom application rules.
Why it fails: Incorrect. Evaluation order does not alter protocol signature recognition.
- B
Custom applications are disabled by default when security policies are compiled.
Why it fails: Incorrect. Custom applications are fully functional if properly defined.
- C
Junos AppID uses deep packet inspection and overrides custom port definitions with recognized protocol signatures.
Junos AppID performs deep packet inspection, so it identifies HTTP by its protocol signature regardless of the configured TCP port 8080. Because signature-based recognition takes precedence over custom port definitions, the engine labels the traffic junos-http, satisfying the stem's requirement that port matching succeeds while application identification overrides it.
- D
The security policy must be changed from zone-based to global to support custom applications.
Why it fails: Incorrect. Scope (zone vs global) does not alter AppID evaluation priority over port definitions.