Question 207 of 504
CryptographymediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is preimage resistance and collision resistance. Preimage resistance ensures that given a hash output, it is computationally infeasible to reverse-engineer any input that produces it, which directly protects the integrity of stored passwords or signed data. Collision resistance guarantees that no two distinct inputs can yield the same hash, preventing an attacker from substituting a fraudulent message for a legitimate one in digital signatures or message authentication codes. On the Systems Security Certified Practitioner SSCP exam, this question tests your understanding of the fundamental properties that distinguish a cryptographically secure hash from a simple checksum; a common trap is confusing second-preimage resistance with collision resistance, but remember that collision resistance is the stricter requirement. A useful memory tip is to think of the three pillars as “one-way, unique, and unpredictable,” where preimage resistance is the one-way property and collision resistance is the uniqueness guarantee.

SSCP Cryptography Practice Question

This SSCP practice question tests your understanding of cryptography. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO of the following are required properties of a cryptographically secure hash function? (Select exactly 2.)

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Collision resistance

Collision resistance (B) is a required property because it ensures that it is computationally infeasible to find two distinct inputs that produce the same hash output. Without this property, an attacker could substitute a legitimate message with a fraudulent one that yields an identical hash, breaking the integrity guarantees of the hash function. This is a fundamental requirement for digital signatures and message authentication codes (MACs) in cryptographic protocols.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Deterministic output

    Why it's wrong here

    Determinism is a property but not a security requirement.

  • Collision resistance

    Why this is correct

    It should be infeasible to find two different inputs with the same hash.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • High speed for large inputs

    Why it's wrong here

    Performance is a design goal but not a security property.

  • Low output entropy

    Why it's wrong here

    High entropy is desired, not low.

  • Preimage resistance

    Why this is correct

    Given a hash, it should be infeasible to find any input that produces it.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

ISC2 often tests the distinction between general hash function properties (like deterministic output) and the specific security properties required for cryptographic use, leading candidates to mistakenly select deterministic output as a required property when it is merely a basic characteristic of any hash function.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Preimage resistance (E) ensures that given a hash output, it is computationally infeasible to find any input that hashes to that value, which is critical for password storage and commitment schemes. Under the hood, these properties rely on the avalanche effect and the one-way nature of functions like SHA-256, where a single bit change in the input flips approximately half the output bits. In real-world scenarios, a failure of collision resistance (e.g., SHA-1's SHAttered attack) allowed attackers to create two different PDF files with the same hash, undermining certificate trust.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SSCP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SSCP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SSCP question test?

Cryptography — This question tests Cryptography — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Collision resistance — Collision resistance (B) is a required property because it ensures that it is computationally infeasible to find two distinct inputs that produce the same hash output. Without this property, an attacker could substitute a legitimate message with a fraudulent one that yields an identical hash, breaking the integrity guarantees of the hash function. This is a fundamental requirement for digital signatures and message authentication codes (MACs) in cryptographic protocols.

What should I do if I get this SSCP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SSCP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SSCP exam.