hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
Detecting Brute-Force Attacks with SIEM Correlation Rules
An organization uses a SIEM to correlate events. The SIEM receives Windows Security Event ID 4625 (failed login) and 4776 (credential validation). An analyst wants to detect a brute-force attack against a service account. Which correlation rule is most effective?
Quick Answer
Alerting on multiple failed logins for the same account from different source IPs within a short window is the most effective rule here because it targets the specific evasion technique attackers use against service accounts: spreading login attempts across many source IPs so that no single IP crosses a per-source threshold. A correlation rule that only counts failures from one IP would miss this pattern entirely, since each individual IP might only generate a handful of failed attempts, well below any reasonable per-IP alert threshold, even though the account as a whole is under sustained attack. By correlating Event ID 4625 (failed logon) and 4776 (credential validation) around the target account rather than around the source IP, the SIEM shifts its unit of analysis to match the actual attack surface: the account being targeted, not any single origin point. The short time window is what separates a genuine, concentrated brute-force burst from unrelated failed logins that happen to occur over the course of a normal day, such as a few users mistyping passwords. This account-centric, multi-source correlation approach is a recurring pattern in SIEM tuning questions: whenever an attack description involves multiple source IPs or hosts targeting one account or resource, the correct detection logic groups events by the target, not by the source.
⚠ Common exam trap
The trap here is that candidates often fixate on a single IP threshold (Option A) because it seems intuitive, but the SSCP exam tests the understanding that modern brute-force attacks distribute across many IPs, making account-based correlation across source IPs the correct detection method.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Alert on multiple failed logins for the same account from different source IPs in 10 minutes
A brute-force attack against a service account typically involves multiple failed login attempts from different source IPs, as attackers often distribute their attempts to evade IP-based blocking. Correlating Event ID 4625 (failed login) and 4776 (credential validation) across multiple source IPs for the same account within a short time window (e.g., 10 minutes) directly identifies this distributed brute-force pattern, which a single-IP threshold would miss.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Alert on more than 10 failed logins from a single IP in 5 minutes
Why it's wrong here
Single IP might be a brute force, but distributed attacks evade this.
- ✗
Alert on successful logins after multiple failures
Why it's wrong here
Success after failure is normal; attack may not succeed.
- ✓
Alert on multiple failed logins for the same account from different source IPs in 10 minutes
Why this is correct
Detects distributed brute force against a single account.
- ✗
Alert on any Event ID 4625 or 4776 with severity high
Why it's wrong here
Too many alerts, high false positive rate.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
This SSCP question is part of Courseiva's 920-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more way this is tested on SSCP
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Given the exhibit, what is the most likely conclusion?
medium- A.The SIEM alert is a false positive and can be ignored
- B.The authentication server logs are misconfigured
- C.The successful login is unrelated and coincidental
- ✓ D.The brute-force attack was successful and the admin account may be compromised
Why D: The exhibit shows a brute-force attack with multiple failed login attempts followed by a successful login from the same source IP. This pattern indicates that the attacker likely guessed or cracked the password, making the admin account compromised. Option D is correct because the sequence of events directly correlates with a successful brute-force attack.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This SSCP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SSCP exam.