Question 425 of 504
Risk Identification, Monitoring and AnalysishardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is a user reporting mechanism. This is correct because detective controls for phishing are designed to identify attacks that have already bypassed preventive measures, such as a user recognizing a suspicious link or attachment in their inbox. A user reporting mechanism enables individuals to flag suspected phishing emails after receipt, allowing the security team to investigate and respond, which aligns with the definition of a detective control—discovering incidents that have already occurred rather than blocking them. On the Systems Security Certified Practitioner SSCP exam, this concept tests your ability to distinguish between preventive controls (like email filters) and detective controls (like user reporting), a common trap where candidates confuse reporting with prevention. Remember, if the control relies on human recognition after the event, it is detective. Memory tip: “Report after receipt” to recall that user reporting detects phishing that has already landed.

SSCP Risk Identification, Monitoring and Analysis Practice Question

This SSCP practice question tests your understanding of risk identification, monitoring and analysis. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An organization's risk register shows a high risk for phishing attacks. Which controls are considered detective controls for this risk?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

User reporting mechanism.

A user reporting mechanism is a detective control because it enables users to identify and report suspected phishing emails after they have been received, allowing the security team to investigate and respond. Unlike preventive controls that block attacks, detective controls discover incidents that have already occurred, such as a user recognizing a malicious link or attachment in their inbox.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Security awareness training.

    Why it's wrong here

    Training is a preventive/deterrent control, not detective.

  • Email filtering.

    Why it's wrong here

    Email filtering is a preventive control that blocks phishing emails before they reach users.

  • User reporting mechanism.

    Why this is correct

    User reporting detects phishing attacks that have reached users, enabling response.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Multi-factor authentication.

    Why it's wrong here

    MFA is a preventive control that protects accounts even if credentials are phished.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

ISC2 often tests the distinction between preventive and detective controls, and the trap here is that candidates confuse 'user reporting' as a reactive or corrective control rather than recognizing it as a detective control that identifies an ongoing or past incident.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

A user reporting mechanism typically integrates with a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system or a phishing analysis platform via APIs (e.g., Microsoft 365's built-in report message add-in or Proofpoint's suspicious mail reporting). When a user clicks 'Report Phishing,' the email is forwarded to a quarantine mailbox, headers and attachments are analyzed using sandboxing and URL reputation checks, and the incident is logged with a unique case ID for tracking. In real-world scenarios, this control is critical for detecting targeted spear-phishing that bypasses filters, as human intuition often catches subtle social engineering cues that automated systems miss.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

An employee at a financial services firm receives an email that appears to come from the IT helpdesk, asking them to reset their password via a link. The link leads to a convincing fake portal that harvests credentials. Security teams use phishing simulations and security-awareness training to reduce this attack vector. Questions like this test whether you can identify social engineering techniques and appropriate controls.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SSCP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SSCP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SSCP question test?

Risk Identification, Monitoring and Analysis — This question tests Risk Identification, Monitoring and Analysis — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: User reporting mechanism. — A user reporting mechanism is a detective control because it enables users to identify and report suspected phishing emails after they have been received, allowing the security team to investigate and respond. Unlike preventive controls that block attacks, detective controls discover incidents that have already occurred, such as a user recognizing a malicious link or attachment in their inbox.

What should I do if I get this SSCP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SSCP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SSCP exam.