- A
Code obfuscation.
Why wrong: Obfuscation does not prevent overflow vulnerabilities.
- B
Input validation.
Validating input length prevents overflow.
- C
Dynamic memory allocation without bounds.
Why wrong: Without bounds checking, overflow still possible.
- D
Use of unsafe functions like strcpy.
Why wrong: Unsafe functions are a cause, not a prevention.
- E
Use of compilers with stack protection.
Stack canaries detect buffer overflow at runtime.
CISSP Software Development Security Practice Question
This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of software development security. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Which TWO of the following are secure coding practices to prevent buffer overflow vulnerabilities?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Input validation.
Input validation ensures data fits within buffers; stack protection (e.g., canaries) detects overflow. Unsafe functions like strcpy are a cause, not prevention. Dynamic memory allocation without bounds still risks overflow. Code obfuscation does not prevent overflow.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Code obfuscation.
Why it's wrong here
Obfuscation does not prevent overflow vulnerabilities.
- ✓
Input validation.
Why this is correct
Validating input length prevents overflow.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Dynamic memory allocation without bounds.
Why it's wrong here
Without bounds checking, overflow still possible.
- ✗
Use of unsafe functions like strcpy.
Why it's wrong here
Unsafe functions are a cause, not a prevention.
- ✓
Use of compilers with stack protection.
Why this is correct
Stack canaries detect buffer overflow at runtime.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which CISSP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
- →
Software Development Security — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Software Development Security practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All CISSP questions
529 questions across all exam domains
- →
Certified Information Systems Security Professional CISSP study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
CISSP practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related CISSP practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Software Development Security practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to Software Development Security.
Security Assessment and Testing practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to Security Assessment and Testing.
Identity and Access Management practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to Identity and Access Management.
Security and Risk Management practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to Security and Risk Management.
Security Architecture and Engineering practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to Security Architecture and Engineering.
Communication and Network Security practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to Communication and Network Security.
Asset Security practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to Asset Security.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to Security Operations.
CISSP fundamentals practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to CISSP fundamentals.
CISSP scenario practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to CISSP scenario.
CISSP troubleshooting practice questions
Practise CISSP questions linked to CISSP troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free CISSP practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this CISSP question test?
Software Development Security — This question tests Software Development Security — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Input validation. — Input validation ensures data fits within buffers; stack protection (e.g., canaries) detects overflow. Unsafe functions like strcpy are a cause, not prevention. Dynamic memory allocation without bounds still risks overflow. Code obfuscation does not prevent overflow.
What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?
Identify which CISSP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026
This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.