Question 100 of 529
Security Architecture and EngineeringmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CISSP Security Architecture and Engineering Practice Question

This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of security architecture and engineering. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Feb 10 10:23:45 server sshd[1234]: Failed password for root from 192.168.1.100 port 22 ssh2
Feb 10 10:23:48 server sshd[1234]: Failed password for root from 192.168.1.100 port 22 ssh2
Feb 10 10:23:50 server sshd[1234]: Failed password for root from 192.168.1.100 port 22 ssh2

Refer to the exhibit. A security analyst finds these logs on a Linux server. What is the most likely cause of these events?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

Feb 10 10:23:45 server sshd[1234]: Failed password for root from 192.168.1.100 port 22 ssh2
Feb 10 10:23:48 server sshd[1234]: Failed password for root from 192.168.1.100 port 22 ssh2
Feb 10 10:23:50 server sshd[1234]: Failed password for root from 192.168.1.100 port 22 ssh2

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

A brute-force attack is in progress

The logs show repeated SSH authentication failures from the same source IP address with different usernames, including root, admin, and user. This pattern of multiple failed login attempts in rapid succession is characteristic of a brute-force attack against the SSH service. The fact that attempts continue across different usernames indicates an automated tool is systematically trying credentials, not a single misconfiguration or network issue.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The root account is disabled

    Why it's wrong here

    If disabled, attempts would not generate failure logs as shown.

  • The firewall is blocking port 22

    Why it's wrong here

    If blocked, the connection would not reach sshd.

  • A brute-force attack is in progress

    Why this is correct

    Correct. Repeated failed passwords from same IP indicate brute-force.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The SSH service is not running

    Why it's wrong here

    If not running, there would be no sshd process to log.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

ISC2 often tests the distinction between a service being unreachable (firewall blocking or service down) versus a service being reachable but under attack, where logs show authentication failures rather than connection failures.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    If disabled, attempts would not generate failure logs as shown.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

SSH brute-force attacks typically use tools like Hydra or Medusa that cycle through username/password combinations. The SSH daemon (sshd) logs each authentication attempt via syslog, and failed attempts are recorded with 'Failed password' messages. In real-world scenarios, attackers often target common usernames (root, admin, user) first, and rate-limiting or fail2ban can mitigate such attacks by temporarily blocking IPs after a threshold of failures.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISSP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISSP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISSP question test?

Security Architecture and Engineering — This question tests Security Architecture and Engineering — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: A brute-force attack is in progress — The logs show repeated SSH authentication failures from the same source IP address with different usernames, including root, admin, and user. This pattern of multiple failed login attempts in rapid succession is characteristic of a brute-force attack against the SSH service. The fact that attempts continue across different usernames indicates an automated tool is systematically trying credentials, not a single misconfiguration or network issue.

What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More CISSP practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.