Question 348 of 529
Asset SecuritymediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct answer is implementing a private repository that mirrors approved open-source libraries with enforced signature verification and hash checks, as this directly prevents supply chain attacks in CI/CD by ensuring only trusted, integrity-verified code enters the build pipeline. This approach stops malicious code from public package repositories from being automatically pulled during builds, addressing the root cause without requiring manual review of every library, which would slow development. On the CISSP exam, this tests your understanding of secure software supply chain management under Domain 8 (Software Development Security), where the trap is choosing post-build scanning or manual approval—both fail to prevent initial injection. Remember the mnemonic “Mirror, Verify, Trust”: mirror approved sources, verify signatures and hashes, and trust only what passes both checks.

CISSP Asset Security Practice Question

This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of asset security. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A software development company uses a continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipeline that automatically builds and deploys code to production after passing automated tests. The code repository contains proprietary algorithms and customer data. A recent incident was traced to an attacker who injected malicious code into a library that was pulled from a public package repository during the build process. The company wants to prevent similar supply chain attacks without significantly slowing development. Which of the following is the BEST course of action?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Implement a private repository that mirrors approved open-source libraries and enforces signature verification and hash checks before allowing use

Option D is correct because implementing a private repository that mirrors only approved, vetted open-source libraries with enforced signature verification and hash checks directly addresses supply chain attacks by ensuring that only trusted, integrity-verified code enters the build pipeline. This approach prevents malicious code from public repositories from being pulled automatically, without requiring manual review of every library (which would slow development) or relying on post-build scanning that cannot prevent the initial injection. It aligns with the principle of secure software supply chain management by establishing a trusted source of components.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Require all developers to perform manual code review of every third-party library before inclusion

    Why it's wrong here

    Manual review of all libraries is time-consuming and impractical for large projects; it also may not detect sophisticated backdoors.

  • Perform static application security testing (SAST) on the entire codebase including libraries

    Why it's wrong here

    SAST tools can detect some vulnerabilities but are not designed to find intentional malicious code.

  • Increase the frequency of vulnerability scanning on the production environment and delay deployment of any library that has a deprecation notice

    Why it's wrong here

    Vulnerability scanning is reactive and does not prevent initial injection; delaying deprecation notices does not address the risk.

  • Implement a private repository that mirrors approved open-source libraries and enforces signature verification and hash checks before allowing use

    Why this is correct

    A private mirror with integrity checks ensures only verified packages are used, blocking malicious ones from the public repo.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

ISC2 often tests the distinction between reactive security controls (like SAST or vulnerability scanning) and proactive supply chain controls (like private repositories with integrity verification), and the trap here is that candidates may choose SAST (option B) because it sounds technical and comprehensive, but it fails to prevent the initial injection of malicious code during the build process.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

A private package repository (e.g., using tools like JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus, or AWS CodeArtifact) acts as a proxy cache that stores approved versions of libraries with cryptographic signature verification (e.g., using GPG signatures or checksums like SHA-256) and can enforce policies such as only allowing libraries from curated sources. This mirrors the concept of a software bill of materials (SBOM) and aligns with NIST SP 800-204D recommendations for securing the software supply chain. In a real-world scenario, the SolarWinds attack exploited a compromised build pipeline that pulled unsigned updates; a private repository with signature enforcement would have blocked the malicious code.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security team runs a vulnerability scan on a web application and discovers an unpatched SQL injection flaw. The team prioritises remediation by CVSS score — critical flaws are patched within 24 hours, high within 7 days. Questions like this test whether you understand vulnerability management processes, scanning tools, and remediation prioritisation.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISSP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISSP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISSP question test?

Asset Security — This question tests Asset Security — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Implement a private repository that mirrors approved open-source libraries and enforces signature verification and hash checks before allowing use — Option D is correct because implementing a private repository that mirrors only approved, vetted open-source libraries with enforced signature verification and hash checks directly addresses supply chain attacks by ensuring that only trusted, integrity-verified code enters the build pipeline. This approach prevents malicious code from public repositories from being pulled automatically, without requiring manual review of every library (which would slow development) or relying on post-build scanning that cannot prevent the initial injection. It aligns with the principle of secure software supply chain management by establishing a trusted source of components.

What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.