Question 393 of 529
Security Assessment and TestingmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is a vulnerability scan. This is the correct choice because a non-disruptive security assessment must identify weaknesses without exploiting them, and vulnerability scanning uses passive techniques like banner grabbing and version fingerprinting to detect missing patches or misconfigurations without causing system crashes or denial-of-service. On the CISSP exam, this question tests your understanding of the difference between passive and active assessments—a common trap is confusing vulnerability scans with penetration tests, which actively exploit vulnerabilities and risk disruption. Remember that the key differentiator is exploitation: if the assessment does not exploit, it is a scan. A useful memory tip is to think of the word “scan” as “stop, check, and note”—you are only looking, not touching.

CISSP Security Assessment and Testing Practice Question

This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of security assessment and testing. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A company wants to test the effectiveness of its security controls without causing disruption. Which type of assessment is most appropriate?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Vulnerability scan

A vulnerability scan is the most appropriate assessment because it passively identifies known vulnerabilities (e.g., missing patches, misconfigurations) without exploiting them, ensuring no disruption to production systems. Unlike active exploitation tests, vulnerability scanners use non-intrusive probes (e.g., banner grabbing, version fingerprinting) that do not trigger denial-of-service or system crashes. This aligns with the requirement to test control effectiveness while maintaining operational stability.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Penetration test

    Why it's wrong here

    Penetration testing is intended to exploit vulnerabilities and may cause service disruptions.

  • Security audit

    Why it's wrong here

    Security audits evaluate compliance and governance, not direct control effectiveness.

  • Vulnerability scan

    Why this is correct

    Vulnerability scanning assesses systems passively without exploitation, minimizing disruption.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Red team exercise

    Why it's wrong here

    Red team exercises are adversarial and can be disruptive to operations.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

ISC2 often tests the distinction between passive identification (vulnerability scan) and active exploitation (penetration test), where candidates mistakenly choose penetration test because they think it provides a more thorough assessment, ignoring the explicit 'without causing disruption' constraint.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Vulnerability scanners like Nessus or OpenVAS operate by sending crafted packets (e.g., TCP SYN scans, HTTP requests) to enumerate services and compare responses against a database of CVEs. They avoid exploitation by using safe checks (e.g., checking patch levels via registry keys or SSH banner versions) rather than triggering actual exploits. In a real-world scenario, a vulnerability scan might detect an unpatched SMB vulnerability (e.g., EternalBlue) without executing the exploit, allowing remediation before a penetration test or attacker exploits it.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security team runs a vulnerability scan on a web application and discovers an unpatched SQL injection flaw. The team prioritises remediation by CVSS score — critical flaws are patched within 24 hours, high within 7 days. Questions like this test whether you understand vulnerability management processes, scanning tools, and remediation prioritisation.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISSP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISSP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISSP question test?

Security Assessment and Testing — This question tests Security Assessment and Testing — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Vulnerability scan — A vulnerability scan is the most appropriate assessment because it passively identifies known vulnerabilities (e.g., missing patches, misconfigurations) without exploiting them, ensuring no disruption to production systems. Unlike active exploitation tests, vulnerability scanners use non-intrusive probes (e.g., banner grabbing, version fingerprinting) that do not trigger denial-of-service or system crashes. This aligns with the requirement to test control effectiveness while maintaining operational stability.

What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.