Question 281 of 529
Security Assessment and TestinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct recommendation is to migrate to a widely-accepted encryption standard such as AES. This is because custom encryption algorithms carry severe risks, as they lack the extensive peer review, cryptanalysis, and public testing that standards like AES have undergone for decades. Even if a developer claims better efficiency, the absence of proven security guarantees against known attack vectors—such as differential or linear cryptanalysis—makes the application vulnerable, especially for protecting sensitive financial data. On the CISSP exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the cryptographic lifecycle and the principle that security through obscurity is never acceptable; a common trap is accepting performance claims over verifiable security. Remember the mnemonic “Don’t Roll Your Own Crypto”—if it hasn’t survived the crucible of global cryptanalysis, it’s not ready for production.

CISSP Security Assessment and Testing Practice Question

This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of security assessment and testing. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

During a security audit of a financial application, the auditor discovers that the application uses a custom encryption algorithm for storing sensitive data. The developer claims it is more efficient than AES. What should the auditor recommend?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Migrate to a widely-accepted encryption standard such as AES

Custom encryption algorithms are highly risky because they have not undergone the extensive peer review and cryptanalysis that standards like AES have. Even if the developer claims better efficiency, the lack of proven security guarantees makes the application vulnerable to attacks. The correct recommendation is to migrate to a widely-accepted standard such as AES, which is FIPS 197 validated and trusted for protecting sensitive financial data.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Conduct additional penetration testing on the encryption implementation

    Why it's wrong here

    Testing cannot guarantee security of a custom algorithm.

  • Accept the risk if the algorithm is more efficient

    Why it's wrong here

    Efficiency does not justify security risk.

  • Perform a cryptoanalysis of the algorithm to validate its strength

    Why it's wrong here

    Even if valid, custom algorithms are not recommended for production.

  • Migrate to a widely-accepted encryption standard such as AES

    Why this is correct

    Standard algorithms are extensively reviewed and trusted.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may think performing cryptanalysis (Option C) is a valid audit recommendation, but in practice, the auditor's role is to enforce the use of proven standards, not to validate unproven custom cryptography.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) is a symmetric block cipher standardized by NIST in FIPS 197, using key sizes of 128, 192, or 256 bits, and has withstood years of global cryptanalysis. Custom algorithms often lack diffusion and confusion properties, making them susceptible to linear and differential cryptanalysis. In a real-world scenario, a financial application using a custom cipher could have its encrypted data decrypted by an attacker with moderate resources, leading to massive data breach liabilities.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A developer is choosing between AES-256 (symmetric) and RSA-2048 (asymmetric) for encrypting a large file that will be sent to a partner. Symmetric encryption is fast but requires key exchange; asymmetric is slower but solves the key distribution problem. A hybrid approach — encrypt the file with AES, encrypt the AES key with RSA — is standard. Questions like this test whether you understand when each approach applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISSP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISSP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISSP question test?

Security Assessment and Testing — This question tests Security Assessment and Testing — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Migrate to a widely-accepted encryption standard such as AES — Custom encryption algorithms are highly risky because they have not undergone the extensive peer review and cryptanalysis that standards like AES have. Even if the developer claims better efficiency, the lack of proven security guarantees makes the application vulnerable to attacks. The correct recommendation is to migrate to a widely-accepted standard such as AES, which is FIPS 197 validated and trusted for protecting sensitive financial data.

What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.