Question 272 of 529
Security OperationseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

Accountability is the correct choice because shared generic accounts directly violate the principle that each user must be uniquely identified and their actions traceable. When multiple employees use a single account, audit logs cannot attribute specific database operations—such as SELECT, UPDATE, or DELETE—to any particular individual, breaking the chain of responsibility required for accountability. On the CISSP exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the Identity and Access Management (IAM) domain, where accountability is a core security operations concept; a common trap is confusing accountability with non-repudiation, but accountability focuses on traceability to a specific user, while non-repudiation ensures that user cannot deny the action. Remember the memory tip: “One account, one user—if it’s shared, accountability is impaired.”

CISSP Security Operations Practice Question

This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of security operations. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

During a security audit, an organization discovers that several employees are sharing a single generic account to access a critical database. Which principle of security operations is being violated?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Accountability

Accountability requires that each individual user be uniquely identified and their actions traceable. Sharing a generic account breaks this chain because the audit logs cannot attribute specific database operations (e.g., SELECT, UPDATE, DELETE) to a particular employee, making it impossible to hold anyone responsible for misuse or errors.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Accountability

    Why this is correct

    Account sharing removes the ability to trace actions to an individual, violating accountability.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Separation of duties

    Why it's wrong here

    Separation of duties ensures no single person has excessive control, but account sharing is a different issue.

  • Defense in depth

    Why it's wrong here

    Defense in depth is a layered security approach, not directly related to account sharing.

  • Least privilege

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege is about granting minimal permissions, not about account sharing.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse the lack of individual accountability with the principle of least privilege, assuming that sharing a generic account automatically means excessive permissions, when the real violation is the inability to uniquely identify and trace user actions.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, database audit logs (e.g., Oracle Fine-Grained Auditing or SQL Server Audit) record the session user (SUSER_SNAME()) and application user. With a generic account, the session user is always the same, so forensic analysis cannot distinguish between a legitimate query and a malicious one. In real-world breaches, shared accounts are often the root cause of undetected insider threats, as seen in the 2013 Target breach where shared vendor credentials masked lateral movement.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISSP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISSP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISSP question test?

Security Operations — This question tests Security Operations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Accountability — Accountability requires that each individual user be uniquely identified and their actions traceable. Sharing a generic account breaks this chain because the audit logs cannot attribute specific database operations (e.g., SELECT, UPDATE, DELETE) to a particular employee, making it impossible to hold anyone responsible for misuse or errors.

What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.