Courseiva
Security and Risk ManagementmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

CISSP Security and Risk Management Practice Question

A security manager is choosing a risk response for a high-impact, high-likelihood risk. Which TWO responses are most appropriate? (Select TWO)

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Risk mitigation

For high-impact, high-likelihood risks, avoidance (eliminating the activity) or mitigation (reducing impact/likelihood) are common. Transfer (insurance) may also be used but is less comprehensive. Acceptance is for low risks.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Risk mitigation

    Why this is correct

    Risk mitigation involves implementing specific security controls and countermeasures to actively reduce the likelihood of a risk occurring or to lessen its potential impact. For a high-impact risk, this means taking proactive steps, such as strengthening defenses, improving processes, or deploying new technologies, to bring the risk level down to an acceptable threshold. It is a primary and responsible strategy when the activity causing the risk cannot be avoided.

  • Risk research

    Why it's wrong here

    Risk research is an analytical phase of risk management, focused on identifying, assessing, and understanding the characteristics of threats, vulnerabilities, and potential impacts. While essential for informed decision-making, it is a preparatory step that precedes the selection of a risk response. Research itself does not constitute an action taken to alter the risk's likelihood or impact, which is the defining characteristic of a risk response.

  • Risk avoidance

    Why this is correct

    Risk avoidance is a definitive response that eliminates the risk entirely by discontinuing the activity or process that gives rise to it. For a high-impact risk, this strategy ensures the organization is no longer exposed to the potential harm, making it a very effective, albeit sometimes costly, solution. For example, choosing not to implement a new system due to insurmountable security vulnerabilities is a form of risk avoidance.

  • Risk acceptance

    Why it's wrong here

    Risk acceptance involves consciously deciding to take no action to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk, typically because the cost of mitigation outweighs the potential loss, or the risk is deemed very low. For a high-impact risk, however, simply accepting it without implementing controls is generally irresponsible and contrary to sound security management principles, as it leaves the organization vulnerable to significant harm.

  • Risk deferral

    Why it's wrong here

    Risk deferral is not a recognized or advisable risk response strategy within formal cybersecurity frameworks like NIST or ISO 27005. While an organization might operationally delay a response due to resource constraints, this is an operational decision, not a strategic risk treatment. For a high-impact risk, deferring action would leave the organization exposed to severe consequences without a planned countermeasure, which is unacceptable in robust risk management.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CISSP question from scratch — 747 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.