Question 116 of 1,000
Identity and Access ManagementmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

CISSP Identity and Access Management Practice Question

This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of identity and access management. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A security analyst is reviewing access controls for a financial application. Which TWO of the following are considered best practices for preventing fraud? (Select TWO.)

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Two-person control

Two-person control (D) is a best practice for preventing fraud because it requires two authorized individuals to perform a critical action, such as approving a high-value transaction or accessing a sensitive system. This ensures collusion is needed to commit fraud, as no single person can complete the action alone. In a financial application, this might involve dual approval for wire transfers over a threshold, directly mitigating insider threats.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Password complexity

    Why it's wrong here

    Password complexity strengthens authentication but does not prevent fraud specifically.

  • Single sign-on

    Why it's wrong here

    SSO simplifies access but does not prevent fraud.

  • Least privilege

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege limits access but does not require multiple people.

  • Two-person control

    Why this is correct

    Two-person control requires two people to complete a sensitive action.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Separation of duties

    Why this is correct

    SoD prevents any single person from having excessive control.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse 'least privilege' (a preventive control for limiting access) with 'separation of duties' (a detective/preventive control for fraud), or they incorrectly think 'password complexity' or 'single sign-on' directly prevent fraud when they only address authentication security.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Two-person control is often implemented using a 'maker-checker' model, where one user creates a transaction (maker) and a second user approves it (checker). Separation of duties (E) enforces that no single individual has conflicting responsibilities, such as both initiating and approving a payment, which is critical in financial systems to prevent embezzlement. Under the hood, these controls are enforced by access control lists (ACLs) and workflow engines that check user roles and require multi-party authorization before committing state changes to the database.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISSP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISSP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISSP question test?

Identity and Access Management — This question tests Identity and Access Management — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Two-person control — Two-person control (D) is a best practice for preventing fraud because it requires two authorized individuals to perform a critical action, such as approving a high-value transaction or accessing a sensitive system. This ensures collusion is needed to commit fraud, as no single person can complete the action alone. In a financial application, this might involve dual approval for wire transfers over a threshold, directly mitigating insider threats.

What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.