Question 806 of 1,000
Identity and Access ManagementmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CISSP Identity and Access Management Practice Question

This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of identity and access management. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A financial application requires two employees to authorize a wire transfer. Which principle does this implement?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Separation of duties

Separation of duties (SoD) is the principle that requires two or more individuals to complete a sensitive transaction, such as a wire transfer, to prevent fraud or error. By mandating two employees to authorize the transfer, the application ensures no single person has unchecked control over the entire process, enforcing a dual-control mechanism. This directly implements the SoD principle, which is a core access control concept in identity and access management.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Least privilege

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege means minimal access, not splitting tasks.

  • Separation of duties

    Why this is correct

    Requiring two people to authorize a transfer is SoD.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Need-to-know

    Why it's wrong here

    Need-to-know restricts data access based on necessity.

  • Zero standing privileges

    Why it's wrong here

    Zero standing privileges means no permanent privileged access.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse separation of duties with least privilege, thinking that limiting permissions alone achieves the same goal, but least privilege does not prevent a single user from performing all steps of a critical process.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In practice, separation of duties for wire transfers often uses a 'maker-checker' model, where one employee creates the transaction (maker) and another approves it (checker), with the system enforcing that the same user cannot perform both roles. Under the hood, this is implemented via access control lists (ACLs) or role-based access control (RBAC) that segregate 'create' and 'approve' permissions into distinct roles, often with audit logs capturing the unique user IDs involved. A real-world scenario is in banking systems like SWIFT, where dual control is mandatory for high-value transfers to comply with regulations like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISSP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISSP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISSP question test?

Identity and Access Management — This question tests Identity and Access Management — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Separation of duties — Separation of duties (SoD) is the principle that requires two or more individuals to complete a sensitive transaction, such as a wire transfer, to prevent fraud or error. By mandating two employees to authorize the transfer, the application ensures no single person has unchecked control over the entire process, enforcing a dual-control mechanism. This directly implements the SoD principle, which is a core access control concept in identity and access management.

What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.