Courseiva
Control Selection →hardMultiple Choice

CGRC Practice Question: A system owner determines that a specific NIST 800-53 control cannot be implemented due…

A system owner determines that a specific NIST 800-53 control cannot be implemented due to legacy hardware constraints. They choose to implement a different control to mitigate the same risk. This is an example of what?

⚠ Common exam trap

CGRC often tests the distinction between compensating controls and risk acceptance; candidates may think that if a control cannot be implemented, the only option is to accept the risk, but compensating controls are the correct answer when an alternative is implemented.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Compensating Control.

This is an example of a compensating control. A compensating control is an alternative control implemented when the original control cannot be applied due to constraints, but it still mitigates the same risk. The system owner is substituting a different control to achieve the same security objective, which is the definition of a compensating control.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Risk Acceptance.

    Why it's wrong here

    Risk acceptance retains the residual exposure and formally documents it, without substituting anything; here a compensating control is actually applied, so the risk is mitigated rather than accepted. Acceptance is tempting because legacy constraints often force it, and it would be correct only when no compensating control exists and management signs off on the exposure.

  • ✗

    Baseline Tailoring.

    Why it's wrong here

    Tailoring selects or scopes controls from the baseline to fit the system, but it does not introduce a substitute control that differs from the catalogue entry. It is tempting because legacy constraints do drive scoping decisions, and tailoring would be correct when controls are omitted or parameterised, not replaced by an alternative mitigating mechanism.

  • ✗

    Control Supplementation.

    Why it's wrong here

    Supplementation adds controls beyond the baseline to strengthen coverage, whereas this scenario swaps an unimplementable control for a different one achieving the same objective. It is tempting because both involve adding controls, and supplementation would be correct when the baseline is insufficient and extra controls are layered on rather than substituted.

  • ✓

    Compensating Control.

    Why this is correct

    Legacy hardware prevents the baseline NIST 800-53 control from being met, so an alternative control is applied to reduce the same risk to an acceptable level. That substitution, driven by the implementation constraint, is precisely what defines a compensating control.

About these practice questions

One of 341 original CGRC practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

You might also like

Similar CGRC questions

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Security Systems Architect · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official (ISC)² exam blueprint

This CGRC practice question is part of Courseiva's free (ISC)² certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CGRC exam.