Question 76 of 500
IT Risk IdentificationmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is threat modeling and brainstorming, as these are two of the recognized IT risk identification techniques explicitly cited in the CRISC exam domain. Threat modeling is correct because it systematically identifies threats, vulnerabilities, and potential attack vectors by analyzing system architecture, data flows, and trust boundaries, enabling proactive risk mitigation. Brainstorming leverages collective stakeholder expertise to surface a broad range of risk scenarios without requiring quantitative data, making it a foundational qualitative approach. On the Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish recognized techniques from informal or non-standard methods; a common trap is confusing risk identification with risk analysis tools like SWOT or Delphi. Remember the memory tip: “Think of the two Bs—Brainstorming and Building threat models—as the core pair for surfacing risks before you analyze them.”

CRISC IT Risk Identification Practice Question

This CRISC practice question tests your understanding of it risk identification. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO of the following are recognized techniques for identifying IT risks? (Select exactly 2.)

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Brainstorming sessions

Brainstorming sessions (B) are a recognized technique for IT risk identification because they leverage the collective expertise of stakeholders to surface potential threats, vulnerabilities, and risk scenarios in a structured or unstructured group setting. This method is specifically cited in ISACA's CRISC Review Manual as a qualitative risk identification approach, often used during the early stages of risk assessment to generate a comprehensive list of risks without requiring quantitative data.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ROI calculation

    Why it's wrong here

    ROI is financial analysis, not risk identification.

  • Brainstorming sessions

    Why this is correct

    Brainstorming with stakeholders generates risk ideas.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Benchmarking against industry peers

    Why it's wrong here

    Benchmarking measures performance, not risks.

  • Threat modeling

    Why this is correct

    Threat modeling systematically identifies threats and vulnerabilities.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • SWOT analysis

    Why it's wrong here

    SWOT is for strategic planning, not specific IT risk identification.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse strategic or financial analysis tools (like SWOT or ROI) with risk identification techniques, but CRISC specifically requires methods that directly uncover threats and vulnerabilities, such as brainstorming and threat modeling, rather than high-level planning or performance metrics.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Threat modeling (D) is a structured technique that systematically identifies threats by analyzing system architecture, data flows, trust boundaries, and attack surfaces, often using frameworks like STRIDE or PASTA. In practice, threat modeling goes beyond simple brainstorming by mapping potential attack vectors to specific assets and controls, enabling proactive risk mitigation before deployment. For example, a threat model for a web application might reveal SQL injection risks by tracing user input paths through the data flow diagram, which brainstorming alone might miss.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CRISC exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CRISC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CRISC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CRISC question test?

IT Risk Identification — This question tests IT Risk Identification — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Brainstorming sessions — Brainstorming sessions (B) are a recognized technique for IT risk identification because they leverage the collective expertise of stakeholders to surface potential threats, vulnerabilities, and risk scenarios in a structured or unstructured group setting. This method is specifically cited in ISACA's CRISC Review Manual as a qualitative risk identification approach, often used during the early stages of risk assessment to generate a comprehensive list of risks without requiring quantitative data.

What should I do if I get this CRISC question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on CRISC

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. Which TWO of the following are key risk identification techniques used to identify threats and vulnerabilities in IT systems? (Select exactly 2.)

medium
  • A.Risk mitigation
  • B.Vulnerability scanning
  • C.Risk transfer
  • D.Threat modeling
  • E.Access control implementation

Why B: Vulnerability scanning is a key risk identification technique that systematically probes IT systems for known vulnerabilities, such as unpatched software or misconfigurations, using tools like Nessus or OpenVAS. It directly identifies weaknesses that could be exploited by threats, making it essential for the risk identification phase.

Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.