Courseiva
IT Risk Assessment →mediumMultiple Choice

CRISC IT Risk Assessment Practice Question

In the FAIR framework, Loss Event Frequency (LEF) is calculated as:

⚠ Common exam trap

CRISC often tests the FAIR formula by mixing it with traditional ALE (ARO × SLE); candidates who memorize ALE but not FAIR's decomposition pick the ARO × SLE option.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Threat Event Frequency × Vulnerability

In the FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) framework, Loss Event Frequency (LEF) is the probable frequency of loss events in a given timeframe. It is derived by multiplying Threat Event Frequency (TEF) — how often a threat agent acts — by Vulnerability, which is the probability that a threat event becomes a loss event. This product yields LEF.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Threat Event Frequency + Vulnerability

    Why it's wrong here

    Threat Event Frequency plus Vulnerability is not the FAIR formula; LEF is derived by multiplying Threat Event Frequency by Vulnerability (the probability a threat event becomes a loss event). Addition is tempting because both factors feed LEF, but FAIR composes them multiplicatively, so summing them misstates risk magnitude.

  • ✗

    Annualized Rate of Occurrence × Single Loss Expectancy

    Why it's wrong here

    LEF measures how often loss events occur, so pairing a frequency rate with Single Loss Expectancy (a monetary magnitude) mixes the wrong axis; that product is actually Annualised Loss Expectancy. Annualised Rate of Occurrence belongs with vulnerability to derive LEF, making this tempting when frequency and impact terms are conflated.

  • ✗

    Loss Magnitude × Vulnerability

    Why it's wrong here

    Loss Magnitude measures the financial impact of a realised threat event, so multiplying it by Vulnerability produces a magnitude-weighted figure, not a frequency. FAIR derives LEF from Threat Event Frequency and Vulnerability. Loss Magnitude belongs to the risk calculation, combined with LEF to produce Annualised Loss Expectancy — tempting because both factors genuinely appear in FAIR.

  • ✓

    Threat Event Frequency × Vulnerability

    Why this is correct

    FAIR decomposes Loss Event Frequency into Threat Event Frequency multiplied by Vulnerability, where Vulnerability is the probability that a threat event becomes a loss event. This differs from Loss Magnitude, which is a separate factor in the risk calculation.

About these practice questions

This CRISC question is part of Courseiva's 1,062-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official ISACA exam blueprint

This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.