Question 285 of 500
IT Risk IdentificationhardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is threat intelligence feeds and scenario analysis. These two risk identification techniques are most appropriate for emerging technologies because they compensate for the lack of historical data—scenario analysis constructs plausible future states to explore how new technologies might introduce unforeseen risks, while threat intelligence feeds provide real-time, external data on vulnerabilities and attack patterns targeting those technologies. On the CRISC exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish proactive, forward-looking methods from traditional techniques like brainstorming or checklists, which rely on past experience. A common trap is selecting “root cause analysis” or “SWOT analysis,” but these are less suited for novel risks with no precedent. Memory tip: think “Future and Feeds”—scenario analysis looks forward, threat feeds look outward.

CRISC IT Risk Identification Practice Question

This CRISC practice question tests your understanding of it risk identification. Compare every option against the stated constraints before choosing — the best answer satisfies all requirements, not just the most obvious one. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO risk identification techniques are most appropriate for identifying emerging risks from new technologies?

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Scenario analysis

Scenario analysis is correct because it involves constructing plausible future states to explore how new technologies might introduce unforeseen risks, making it ideal for emerging technologies where historical data is absent. Threat intelligence feeds are correct because they provide real-time, external data on vulnerabilities, exploits, and attack patterns targeting new technologies, enabling proactive risk identification.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Scenario analysis

    Why this is correct

    Scenario analysis explores potential future risks from new technologies.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Historical incident review

    Why it's wrong here

    Historical review is backward-looking and may miss novel risks.

  • Delphi technique

    Why it's wrong here

    Delphi technique gathers expert opinions but is less proactive for emerging risks.

  • Peer benchmarking

    Why it's wrong here

    Benchmarking compares current state, not emerging risks.

  • Threat intelligence feeds

    Why this is correct

    Threat intelligence provides current information on emerging threats.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often choose historical incident review or peer benchmarking because they seem data-driven, but they fail to recognize that emerging technologies lack the historical data or peer maturity needed for these methods to be effective.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Scenario analysis under the hood uses techniques like morphological analysis or cross-impact matrices to systematically vary technology adoption rates, regulatory changes, and attacker capabilities, generating risk scenarios with assigned probabilities. Threat intelligence feeds aggregate data from sources such as CVE databases, dark web monitoring, and honeypot networks, using STIX/TAXII standards to structure and share indicators of compromise (IOCs) relevant to new technology stacks like container orchestration or AI/ML pipelines.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CRISC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CRISC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CRISC question test?

IT Risk Identification — This question tests IT Risk Identification — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Scenario analysis — Scenario analysis is correct because it involves constructing plausible future states to explore how new technologies might introduce unforeseen risks, making it ideal for emerging technologies where historical data is absent. Threat intelligence feeds are correct because they provide real-time, external data on vulnerabilities, exploits, and attack patterns targeting new technologies, enabling proactive risk identification.

What should I do if I get this CRISC question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.