CRISC Risk Response and Reporting Practice Question
A vendor is classified as 'critical' based on its access to sensitive data and the criticality of its service. According to best practices, what minimum security requirement should be mandated for this vendor?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
SOC 2 Type II report
For critical vendors, the risk appetite typically requires a SOC 2 Type II report, which provides assurance over controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Annual self-assessment questionnaire
Why it's wrong here
Self-assessments are less rigorous and typically used for lower-tier vendors.
- ✗
Penetration test results from the vendor
Why it's wrong here
Penetration tests are point-in-time and not a comprehensive control report.
- ✗
ISO 27001 certificate
Why it's wrong here
ISO 27001 certifies a management system, but SOC 2 Type II is more common for critical vendors in many contexts.
- ✓
SOC 2 Type II report
Why this is correct
SOC 2 Type II provides independent assurance over controls over a period.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every CRISC question from scratch — 983 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.