The answer is that the most significant risk is student account compromise leading to unauthorized access to sensitive academic data. Without MFA, student accounts are vulnerable to credential theft or brute-force attacks, which could expose personally identifiable information and grades protected under FERPA, directly harming the university’s reputation and inviting legal penalties. On the CRISC exam, this scenario tests your ability to prioritize business-impacting risks over vendor history or policy technicalities—a common trap is fixating on the vendor’s minor incident rather than the missing MFA control for high-volume, low-privilege accounts. Remember, the core concept is that risk identification must focus on the likelihood and impact of a breach, not on whether a control is “required” only for administrative roles. Memory tip: “MFA for all, or risk the fall”—student accounts are the largest attack surface, and their compromise erodes trust faster than any vendor hiccup.
CRISC IT Risk Identification Practice Question
This CRISC practice question tests your understanding of it risk identification. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A university's IT department is implementing a single sign-on (SSO) solution for students and faculty. The solution will integrate with existing Active Directory and a cloud-based learning management system (LMS). During risk identification, the team learns that the SSO vendor had a minor security incident last year. The university's security policy requires multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all administrative access, but the SSO solution does not support MFA for student accounts. The project manager insists that MFA for students is not necessary because they only access academic records. The risk team must identify the most significant risk that could affect the university's reputation. Which risk should be documented?
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Without MFA, student accounts could be compromised to access sensitive academic data.
The most significant reputational risk is that without MFA, student accounts are vulnerable to credential theft or brute-force attacks. If an attacker compromises a student account, they could access sensitive academic records (e.g., grades, personal data) protected under FERPA, leading to data breaches, legal penalties, and loss of public trust. The SSO vendor's past incident is less relevant because it was minor and does not directly expose the university's data.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
✗
SSO vendor's historical security incident could impact service availability.
Why it's wrong here
Availability impact is less likely to cause reputational harm.
✗
Students may share passwords, leading to account compromise.
Why it's wrong here
Password sharing is a concern but not the most significant risk.
✗
Lack of MFA for administrative accounts could allow unauthorized changes.
Without MFA, student accounts could be compromised to access sensitive academic data.
Why this is correct
Compromised student accounts can lead to data breach and reputational damage.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates focus on the vendor's past incident (Option A) as a red flag, but the real risk is the missing MFA control for student accounts, which directly enables unauthorized access to sensitive data and reputational damage.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
In SSO implementations, the authentication gateway (e.g., SAML 2.0 or OAuth 2.0) is the single point of failure; if it lacks MFA for any user class, attackers can exploit credential stuffing or phishing to gain access to all linked resources, including the LMS. Under FERPA, academic records are considered protected educational records, and a breach involving student data can trigger mandatory notification laws and federal penalties. Real-world incidents (e.g., 2020 University of California ransomware) show that compromised student accounts often serve as entry points for lateral movement into administrative systems.
KKey Concepts to Remember
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
→Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
→Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A practitioner preparing for the CRISC exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
IT Risk Identification — This question tests IT Risk Identification — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Without MFA, student accounts could be compromised to access sensitive academic data. — The most significant reputational risk is that without MFA, student accounts are vulnerable to credential theft or brute-force attacks. If an attacker compromises a student account, they could access sensitive academic records (e.g., grades, personal data) protected under FERPA, leading to data breaches, legal penalties, and loss of public trust. The SSO vendor's past incident is less relevant because it was minor and does not directly expose the university's data.
What should I do if I get this CRISC question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.