Question 163 of 500
Risk and Control Monitoring and ReportinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to investigate the KRI calculation methodology first. This is correct because a green KRI status paired with a high control failure rate signals a fundamental disconnect in the risk measurement framework; the KRI may be using stale data, incorrect thresholds, or a flawed aggregation formula that masks the true risk exposure. On the CRISC exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the relationship between KRIs and control testing, emphasizing that KRIs are leading indicators that must be validated against actual control performance. A common trap is to immediately adjust the KRI threshold or escalate the issue, but the correct first step is always root cause analysis of the metric itself. Remember the memory tip: “Green KRI, red control? Check the math before you scroll.”

CRISC Risk and Control Monitoring and Reporting Practice Question

This CRISC practice question tests your understanding of risk and control monitoring and reporting. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A company monitors key risk indicators (KRIs) using a dashboard. The risk manager notices that a KRI has a green status but the underlying control testing shows a high failure rate. What action should the risk manager take FIRST?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Investigate the KRI calculation methodology

Option C is correct because the discrepancy suggests the KRI calculation may be flawed. Option A jumps to adjusting thresholds without understanding the root cause. Option B may be premature if the control testing is accurate. Option D escalates without first analyzing the issue.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Escalate to the risk committee

    Why it's wrong here

    Escalation without analysis does not provide useful information for decision-making.

  • Change the KRI threshold to amber

    Why it's wrong here

    Changing thresholds without investigation could mask the real problem.

  • Investigate the KRI calculation methodology

    Why this is correct

    The KRI might be using incorrect data or outdated baselines.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Re-test the control

    Why it's wrong here

    Re-testing assumes the control test is wrong, but the issue may be the KRI.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CRISC exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which CRISC exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related CRISC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CRISC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CRISC question test?

Risk and Control Monitoring and Reporting — This question tests Risk and Control Monitoring and Reporting — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Investigate the KRI calculation methodology — Option C is correct because the discrepancy suggests the KRI calculation may be flawed. Option A jumps to adjusting thresholds without understanding the root cause. Option B may be premature if the control testing is accurate. Option D escalates without first analyzing the issue.

What should I do if I get this CRISC question wrong?

Identify which CRISC exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on CRISC

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A technology company has implemented a risk and control monitoring program for its software development lifecycle. The program includes key risk indicators (KRIs) such as number of critical bugs found in production, code review coverage, and time to patch vulnerabilities. After six months, the risk committee noticed that the KRI for code review coverage is consistently green (within threshold), but the number of critical bugs in production remains high. The risk manager suspects a disconnect between the KRI and actual risk. What should the risk manager do FIRST?

easy
  • A.Implement additional testing controls to catch bugs before production.
  • B.Reduce the code review coverage target to lower the risk appetite.
  • C.Review the KRI definition and data source to ensure it reflects effective code review.
  • D.Adjust the code review coverage threshold to a higher percentage.

Why C: Option C is correct because the KRI may not be accurately measuring risk; reviewing the KRI definition and data source will identify if it is measuring the right thing. Option A is wrong immediately modifying the threshold does not address the underlying measurement issue. Option B is wrong reducing coverage would likely increase risk. Option D is wrong additional testing is a separate issue; the KRI itself needs investigation.

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.