Courseiva
Information Security Risk ManagementhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CISM Information Security Risk Management Practice Question

In a risk assessment, a CISM calculates the annualized loss expectancy (ALE) for a specific threat. The single loss expectancy (SLE) is $50,000 and the annualized rate of occurrence (ARO) is 0.2. What is the ALE, and which risk response is most cost-effective if a control costs $12,000 per year and reduces ARO to 0.05?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often compare the control cost to the original ALE ($10,000) or to the residual ALE ($2,500) instead of comparing it to the reduction in ALE ($7,500), leading to incorrect cost-justification conclusions.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Accept the risk because the control is not cost-justified.

The ALE is calculated as SLE × ARO = $50,000 × 0.2 = $10,000. After implementing the control costing $12,000 per year, the residual ALE is $50,000 × 0.05 = $2,500. The annual cost of the control ($12,000) exceeds the reduction in ALE ($10,000 - $2,500 = $7,500), so the control is not cost-justified. Therefore, accepting the risk is the most cost-effective response.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Accept the risk because the control is not cost-justified.

    Why this is correct

    The cost of control is greater than the risk reduction benefit, so acceptance is appropriate.

  • Accept the risk because ALE after control is only $2,500.

    Why it's wrong here

    The current ALE is $10,000, not $2,500; acceptance is based on cost-benefit analysis.

  • Implement the control because it reduces ALE to $2,500.

    Why it's wrong here

    The control cost ($12,000) exceeds the reduction in ALE ($7,500), so it is not cost-effective.

  • Implement the control because ALE is $10,000, and control cost is only $12,000.

    Why it's wrong here

    The control cost should be compared to risk reduction ($7,500), not full ALE.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CISM question from scratch — 871 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CISM practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISM exam.