CISM Information Security Programme Practice Question
A security manager is developing a security scorecard for the C-suite. Which combination of metrics would be MOST appropriate for a one-page dashboard?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Patch compliance percentage and mean time to detect incidents.
A one-page dashboard for the C-suite should include both leading and lagging indicators that provide a high-level view of security posture, such as patch compliance (leading) and mean time to detect (lagging).
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Patch compliance percentage and mean time to detect incidents.
Why this is correct
These are key leading and lagging indicators suitable for executives.
- ✗
Detailed vulnerability counts by severity and system owner.
Why it's wrong here
Too detailed for a C-suite dashboard.
- ✗
Number of security awareness training sessions completed.
Why it's wrong here
This is an activity metric, not a performance indicator.
- ✗
List of all third-party vendors and their risk ratings.
Why it's wrong here
Too detailed for a one-page dashboard.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every CISM question from scratch — 871 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This CISM practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISM exam.