Question 82 of 509
Information System Auditing ProcesshardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is higher than expected error rates in sample testing, as this directly signals that the initial audit assumptions about control effectiveness may be invalid, forcing the IS auditor to adjust the audit approach during fieldwork. When sample errors exceed the tolerable rate, it indicates that controls are not operating as effectively as planned, which reduces the reliance on controls and requires expanding substantive testing or altering procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence. On the CISA exam, this concept tests your understanding of fieldwork dynamics and the ISACA audit standards that mandate adaptive planning when evidence quality falters. A common trap is assuming all deviations are minor, but the key trigger is when error rates materially change the risk assessment. Remember the mnemonic “H.E.A.R.T.”—Higher Error rates Alter the Real Testing—to recall that fieldwork adjustments are driven by unexpected sample outcomes.

CISA Information System Auditing Process Practice Question

This CISA practice question tests your understanding of information system auditing process. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO of the following are indicators that an IS auditor may need to adjust the audit approach during fieldwork? (Select TWO.)

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence

Option A is correct because if the IS auditor cannot obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the audit approach must be adjusted—for example, by expanding sample sizes, using alternative procedures, or re-evaluating the reliance on controls. This directly impacts the ability to form an audit opinion and is a key fieldwork trigger per ISACA audit standards.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence

    Why this is correct

    May require alternative procedures or audit approach.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Completion of the initial risk assessment

    Why it's wrong here

    This should be done during planning.

  • Audit team members are behind schedule

    Why it's wrong here

    Schedule issues may require resource adjustments, not approach.

  • Management requests a change in audit scope

    Why it's wrong here

    Scope changes need formal revision, not just approach adjustment.

  • Higher than expected error rates in sample testing

    Why this is correct

    May indicate ineffective controls, requiring expanded testing or revised assessment.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

ISACA often tests the distinction between project management issues (like being behind schedule) and substantive audit evidence issues; candidates mistakenly select 'behind schedule' as a reason to adjust the audit approach, but it is a resource or timing problem, not a validity-of-evidence trigger.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Higher than expected error rates (Option E) indicate that the initial control risk assessment may be inaccurate, requiring the auditor to revise the nature, timing, or extent of substantive procedures—for example, moving from a reliance on controls to a predominantly substantive approach. This aligns with ISA 330 and ISACA guidelines on responding to assessed risks when audit evidence contradicts initial assumptions.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISA practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISA practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISA question test?

Information System Auditing Process — This question tests Information System Auditing Process — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence — Option A is correct because if the IS auditor cannot obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the audit approach must be adjusted—for example, by expanding sample sizes, using alternative procedures, or re-evaluating the reliance on controls. This directly impacts the ability to form an audit opinion and is a key fieldwork trigger per ISACA audit standards.

What should I do if I get this CISA question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISA practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISA exam.