Question 243 of 1,000
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CISA Practice Question: During an IT audit, the auditor observes that…

This CISA practice question tests your understanding of cisa exam topics. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

During an IT audit, the auditor observes that mandatory vacation policies are not enforced for IT staff with access to financial systems. What is the PRIMARY risk associated with this finding?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "primary"

    Why it matters: Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Increased risk of undetected fraud

Mandatory vacation policies force the periodic removal of an employee's access, which allows detection of irregularities or fraudulent activities that require the employee's continued presence to conceal. Without enforcement, a malicious insider could perpetrate fraud (e.g., creating ghost vendors, altering payment records) and cover it up by maintaining daily control over transactions. This directly increases the risk that fraudulent actions will go undetected over extended periods.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Increased likelihood of system downtime

    Why it's wrong here

    Mandatory vacation is not directly related to system downtime.

  • Increased risk of undetected fraud

    Why this is correct

    Without mandatory vacation, employees could perpetrate fraud without being caught during their absence.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "primary" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Inadequate segregation of duties

    Why it's wrong here

    Segregation of duties is a separate control; mandatory vacation is a detective control.

  • Non-compliance with licensing agreements

    Why it's wrong here

    Licensing compliance is unrelated to vacation policies.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse mandatory vacation policies with segregation of duties, assuming both address the same control objective, when in fact vacation enforcement is a detective control for fraud detection, not a preventive control for duty separation.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Mandatory vacation policies are a detective control that leverages the principle that a fraud scheme requiring ongoing manual intervention (e.g., overriding payment approvals, modifying audit logs) will break down when the perpetrator is absent. In financial systems, this is critical because many frauds involve creating fictitious transactions that require the fraudster to approve or reconcile them daily. Without enforced absence, the fraud can persist indefinitely, as the perpetrator can continuously override or conceal the evidence.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CISA exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

Related practice questions

Related CISA practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISA practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISA question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Increased risk of undetected fraud — Mandatory vacation policies force the periodic removal of an employee's access, which allows detection of irregularities or fraudulent activities that require the employee's continued presence to conceal. Without enforcement, a malicious insider could perpetrate fraud (e.g., creating ghost vendors, altering payment records) and cover it up by maintaining daily control over transactions. This directly increases the risk that fraudulent actions will go undetected over extended periods.

What should I do if I get this CISA question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "primary". Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISA practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISA exam.