Question 204 of 1,000

CISA Practice Question: Information Systems Operations and Business Resilience

This CISA practice question tests your understanding of information systems operations and business resilience. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An organization uses a third-party vendor for application support. The vendor has subcontracted some support activities to another firm (fourth party). The contract with the vendor requires the vendor to ensure fourth-party compliance, but there is no direct oversight. What is the IS auditor's primary recommendation?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "primary"

    Why it matters: Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Include a right-to-audit clause for all subcontractors in the contract.

The primary recommendation is to include a right-to-audit clause for all subcontractors in the contract. This ensures the organization retains direct oversight and contractual leverage over fourth-party risks, as relying solely on the vendor's assurance without audit rights creates a blind spot in the supply chain. Without such a clause, the organization cannot independently verify the fourth party's compliance with security controls, which is critical for maintaining business resilience.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Perform a vulnerability assessment on the fourth party.

    Why it's wrong here

    Without legal right, this may not be possible.

  • Include a right-to-audit clause for all subcontractors in the contract.

    Why this is correct

    This provides direct oversight over fourth parties.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "primary" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Terminate the contract with the vendor.

    Why it's wrong here

    Termination is an extreme measure; the issue can be addressed contractually.

  • Require the vendor to provide evidence of fourth-party compliance.

    Why it's wrong here

    While helpful, it does not replace the organization's right to audit.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse operational verification (Option D) with contractual governance, failing to recognize that without a right-to-audit clause, the organization has no enforceable mechanism to independently validate fourth-party compliance.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In third-party risk management, a right-to-audit clause (often referencing SOC 2 Type II reports or ISO 27001 certification) provides the legal basis to perform on-site assessments, review logs, and test controls of subcontractors. Without this clause, the organization is limited to relying on the vendor's attestations, which may not cover all fourth-party activities (e.g., privileged access to production systems or handling of sensitive data). Real-world breaches, such as the Target incident, highlight how fourth-party vulnerabilities can cascade when direct oversight is absent.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CISA exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISA practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISA practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISA question test?

Information Systems Operations and Business Resilience — This question tests Information Systems Operations and Business Resilience — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Include a right-to-audit clause for all subcontractors in the contract. — The primary recommendation is to include a right-to-audit clause for all subcontractors in the contract. This ensures the organization retains direct oversight and contractual leverage over fourth-party risks, as relying solely on the vendor's assurance without audit rights creates a blind spot in the supply chain. Without such a clause, the organization cannot independently verify the fourth party's compliance with security controls, which is critical for maintaining business resilience.

What should I do if I get this CISA question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "primary". Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISA practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISA exam.