A CCOA analyst is reviewing a memory image from a compromised Windows host. The analyst needs to identify evidence of process injection and persistence that may not appear in the file system. Which two artifacts should the analyst prioritize examining? (Choose two.)
Memory-resident process structures retain parent-child relationships and command lines even when the executable is deleted or the process is hidden from the live API. Anomalous chains, such as a browser spawning a command shell, strongly indicate injection or malicious execution. This artifact is volatile and unavailable after reboot, making it a priority in memory forensics for detecting stealthy activity.
Why this answer
Process injection and memory-only persistence are best evidenced by in-memory process relationships and command lines, plus executable memory regions not backed by files on disk. These artifacts exist only in memory and reveal stealthy execution that file system analysis misses. Kernel modules, Prefetch, ShimCache, and registry hives are useful for other purposes but are not the primary indicators of injection in a memory image.
Exam trap
The trap here is selecting disk-based artifacts like Prefetch or registry hives, which do not reveal in-memory injection, instead of the memory-specific process and code region evidence.