- A
Increase the number of Spark partitions by setting spark.sql.shuffle.partitions to a higher value.
More partitions mean less data per partition, reducing memory usage per task. This can resolve OOM without added cost.
- B
Increase the number of worker nodes by adding more n1-standard-4 instances.
Why wrong: Adding nodes increases total cost, contradicting the requirement.
- C
Enable dynamic allocation and use preemptible VMs for some workers.
Why wrong: Preemptible VMs reduce cost but do not directly fix the OOM; they may cause instability.
- D
Switch worker nodes to n1-highmem-4 instances to provide more memory.
Why wrong: This would increase cost because highmem instances are more expensive.
Quick Answer
The answer is to increase the number of Spark shuffle partitions by raising the `spark.sql.shuffle.partitions` configuration. This is correct because the 'Out of Memory' error during the shuffle phase on Dataproc indicates that each executor task is handling too much data per partition, overwhelming the available memory on standard n1-standard-4 nodes. By increasing the partition count, you reduce the data volume each task must process, directly alleviating memory pressure without adding nodes or upgrading hardware—keeping total cost unchanged. On the Google Professional Data Engineer exam, this scenario tests your understanding of Spark memory tuning within Dataproc, often appearing as a cost-conscious optimization trap where candidates might mistakenly suggest scaling the cluster. A common memory tip: when you see "shuffle OOM," think "more partitions, less pressure"—the shuffle is the bottleneck, not the cluster size. Remember the mnemonic "SPLIT for SPARK": Shuffle Partitions Lower Individual Task memory.
PDE Practice Question: Building and operationalizing data processing systems
This PDE practice question tests your understanding of building and operationalizing data processing systems. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Your team runs a weekly batch ETL pipeline using Cloud Dataproc. The pipeline reads raw data from Cloud Storage, transforms it with Apache Spark, and writes results to BigQuery. Recently, the pipeline has been failing with the error 'Out of Memory' during the shuffle phase. The cluster uses standard worker nodes (n1-standard-4). What is the most effective way to resolve this without increasing total cost?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Increase the number of Spark partitions by setting spark.sql.shuffle.partitions to a higher value.
The 'Out of Memory' error during the shuffle phase indicates that individual executor tasks are processing too much data per partition. Increasing `spark.sql.shuffle.partitions` reduces the amount of data each task handles, lowering memory pressure per executor without adding more nodes or upgrading hardware. This directly addresses the shuffle memory bottleneck while keeping the total cluster cost unchanged.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Increase the number of Spark partitions by setting spark.sql.shuffle.partitions to a higher value.
Why this is correct
More partitions mean less data per partition, reducing memory usage per task. This can resolve OOM without added cost.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Increase the number of worker nodes by adding more n1-standard-4 instances.
Why it's wrong here
Adding nodes increases total cost, contradicting the requirement.
- ✗
Enable dynamic allocation and use preemptible VMs for some workers.
Why it's wrong here
Preemptible VMs reduce cost but do not directly fix the OOM; they may cause instability.
- ✗
Switch worker nodes to n1-highmem-4 instances to provide more memory.
Why it's wrong here
This would increase cost because highmem instances are more expensive.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates often assume memory errors must be solved by adding more memory (Option D) or more nodes (Option B), ignoring the cost constraint and the fact that repartitioning can resolve the issue without additional resources.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
During the shuffle phase, Spark writes map output to disk and then fetches it into memory for reduce tasks. The default `spark.sql.shuffle.partitions` is 200, which can be too low for large datasets, causing each partition to exceed executor memory. Increasing this value (e.g., to 1000 or more) distributes the data across more tasks, reducing the memory footprint per task. This is a common tuning parameter for memory-bound shuffle operations, and it does not require any infrastructure changes.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A startup's cloud architect reviews their monthly bill and notices costs are higher than expected for a long-running batch job. Switching from on-demand instances to Reserved Instances — or using Spot/Preemptible VMs — can reduce compute costs by up to 72 %. Questions like this test whether you understand the tradeoffs between commitment, flexibility, and cost across cloud pricing models.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Building and operationalizing data processing systems — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Building and operationalizing data processing systems practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All PDE questions
499 questions across all exam domains
- →
Google Professional Data Engineer study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
PDE practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related PDE practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Designing data processing systems practice questions
Practise PDE questions linked to Designing data processing systems.
Building and operationalizing data processing systems practice questions
Practise PDE questions linked to Building and operationalizing data processing systems.
Operationalizing machine learning models practice questions
Practise PDE questions linked to Operationalizing machine learning models.
Ensuring solution quality practice questions
Practise PDE questions linked to Ensuring solution quality.
PDE fundamentals practice questions
Practise PDE questions linked to PDE fundamentals.
PDE scenario practice questions
Practise PDE questions linked to PDE scenario.
PDE troubleshooting practice questions
Practise PDE questions linked to PDE troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free PDE practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this PDE question test?
Building and operationalizing data processing systems — This question tests Building and operationalizing data processing systems — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Increase the number of Spark partitions by setting spark.sql.shuffle.partitions to a higher value. — The 'Out of Memory' error during the shuffle phase indicates that individual executor tasks are processing too much data per partition. Increasing `spark.sql.shuffle.partitions` reduces the amount of data each task handles, lowering memory pressure per executor without adding more nodes or upgrading hardware. This directly addresses the shuffle memory bottleneck while keeping the total cluster cost unchanged.
What should I do if I get this PDE question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026
This PDE practice question is part of Courseiva's free Google Cloud certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PDE exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.