Refer to the exhibit. You are analyzing the IAM policy for a project. You need to ensure that only authenticated users can access objects in bucket1 under the prefix "reports/". Which of the following statements is correct?
Bob has the objectAdmin role at the project level without conditions, granting him full control over all objects in bucket1.
Why this answer
Option C is correct because the IAM policy grants Bob the roles/storage.objectAdmin role on the entire bucket1, which includes permissions to view, create, and delete any object in the bucket. The condition restricting access to the "reports/" prefix applies only to the objectViewer role, not to Bob's role. Therefore, Bob has full administrative access to all objects in bucket1 without any prefix restriction.
Exam trap
Google Cloud often tests the misconception that a condition applied to one role binding automatically restricts all other role bindings for the same principal, leading candidates to incorrectly assume that Bob's objectAdmin role is limited by the condition on Alice's objectViewer role.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because the condition on objectViewer restricts access to objects under the "reports/" prefix, but it does not prevent listing objects; listing is controlled by the storage.objects.list permission, which is granted by the objectViewer role, and the condition only limits the object-level actions (like get) to the prefix, not the list action itself. Option B is wrong because the service account sa-1 is not mentioned in the IAM policy exhibit; without explicit binding, sa-1 has no access to bucket1 objects. Option D is wrong because Alice is assigned the objectViewer role with a condition that limits access to objects under "reports/", but the condition also applies to listing; however, the statement says she can "only view objects under reports/" — this is partially true but misleading because the condition also restricts listing to that prefix, and the option does not mention that she cannot list objects outside the prefix, making it incorrect as a complete statement.