A logistics company wants to forecast delivery delays and also generate plain-language explanations for dispatchers. Leadership asks the GenAI Leader to choose an approach that keeps the numeric forecast auditable while adding generative explanations. Which design should the GenAI Leader propose?
A dedicated forecasting model produces a repeatable numeric prediction that can be backtested and audited, satisfying the accuracy requirement. Feeding that prediction plus the contributing features into Gemini lets the generative layer translate model output into readable guidance for dispatchers. Each component can be evaluated and improved independently, which is the cleanest separation of concerns for this scenario.
Why this answer
Keeping prediction and narration in separate components lets the forecasting model be validated with standard regression metrics while the language model handles communication. The numeric output remains deterministic and traceable, and the generative layer receives grounded inputs rather than inventing figures, which satisfies both leadership requirements.
Exam trap
The trap here is treating a generative model as a substitute for a purpose-built predictive model whenever the output can be phrased in natural language.