mediumMultiple Select
Generative AI Leader Practice Question: Implement a change management strategy for GenAI…
A company wants to implement a change management strategy for GenAI adoption. Which TWO actions are MOST effective in driving adoption among employees?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Appoint AI champions in each department to advocate and assist
Training programs build competence; AI champions provide peer support. Mandatory adoption and tool removal are counterproductive.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Remove existing tools to force adoption
Why it's wrong here
Removing existing tools disrupts established workflows and creates resentment without demonstrating GenAI's value, so adoption stalls. It is tempting because consolidation forces usage and suits scenarios replacing genuinely redundant, overlapping licences where a single approved tool already covers the same function.
- ✓
Appoint AI champions in each department to advocate and assist
Why this is correct
Embedding advocates within each department gives employees peer-level, context-specific guidance, which addresses the adoption barrier of unfamiliarity and low confidence far better than centralised mandates. Champions translate GenAI use cases into departmental workflows, providing ongoing support that sustains adoption beyond initial training.
- ✗
Limit access to GenAI tools to senior leadership only
Why it's wrong here
Restricting access to senior leadership excludes the broader workforce whose daily tasks GenAI would assist, so organisation-wide adoption cannot occur. It is tempting because controlled pilots reduce risk, and it suits early proof-of-concept phases where a small group validates security and output quality before wider rollout.
- ✗
Make the use of GenAI tools mandatory for all tasks
Why it's wrong here
Mandating GenAI for every task removes employee choice and ignores task suitability, breeding resistance rather than adoption. It is tempting because mandates guarantee initial usage metrics, and they suit compliance-driven rollouts such as security training where universal completion is genuinely required.
- ✓
Provide comprehensive training programs for employees
Why this is correct
Structured training programmes build the practical GenAI literacy employees need to use new tooling confidently, reducing resistance rooted in unfamiliarity. This directly satisfies the stem's adoption goal by equipping staff with the skills that convert mandated rollout into genuine day-to-day usage.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
This Generative AI Leader question is part of Courseiva's 1,008-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This Generative AI Leader practice question is part of Courseiva's free Google Cloud certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the Generative AI Leader exam.