Question 1,631 of 2,152
EIGRP TroubleshootinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 EIGRP Troubleshooting Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of eigrp troubleshooting. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot an EIGRP issue:

R1# debug eigrp fsm

*Mar  1 00:20:45.678: EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - do advertising, metric 131072
*Mar  1 00:20:45.678: EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - route installed in table
*Mar  1 00:20:45.678: EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - metric change from 131072 to 131328
*Mar  1 00:20:45.678: EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - find FS, metric 131328, RD 130816
*Mar  1 00:20:45.678: EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - found FS via 10.1.3.3, metric 131328
*Mar  1 00:20:45.678: EIGRP: 10.1.1.0/24 - new successor is 10.1.3.3

What does this output indicate?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

EIGRP is performing a Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) recomputation due to a metric increase, but a feasible successor is available, so no query is needed.

The debug output shows EIGRP detecting a metric change for 10.1.1.0/24 from 131072 to 131328. DUAL then searches for a feasible successor (FS) and finds one via 10.1.3.3 with a reported distance (RD) of 130816, which is less than the current feasible distance (FD) of 131072. Because a feasible successor exists, DUAL installs the new route without sending queries, confirming option B.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The route 10.1.1.0/24 has become unreachable, and EIGRP is querying neighbors.

    Why it's wrong here

    The route is still reachable with a new successor; no query is sent because a feasible successor exists.

  • EIGRP is performing a Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) recomputation due to a metric increase, but a feasible successor is available, so no query is needed.

    Why this is correct

    The metric increased, but a feasible successor was found, allowing immediate convergence without queries.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The route is being removed from the topology table because the metric changed.

    Why it's wrong here

    The route remains in the topology table with a new successor.

  • EIGRP is sending a query to all neighbors because no feasible successor exists.

    Why it's wrong here

    The debug shows a feasible successor was found, so no query is sent.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the distinction between a local DUAL computation (when a feasible successor exists) and an active query process (when no feasible successor exists), and the trap here is assuming any metric change triggers queries or route removal.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    The debug shows a feasible successor was found, so no query is sent.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

The Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) uses the feasible distance (FD) and reported distance (RD) to determine if a neighbor is a feasible successor. The feasibility condition requires RD < FD; here, RD 130816 is less than the original FD 131072, allowing a local update without queries. In real-world scenarios, this prevents network-wide convergence delays when a link metric increases but an alternate path still satisfies the condition.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

EIGRP Troubleshooting — This question tests EIGRP Troubleshooting — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: EIGRP is performing a Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) recomputation due to a metric increase, but a feasible successor is available, so no query is needed. — The debug output shows EIGRP detecting a metric change for 10.1.1.0/24 from 131072 to 131328. DUAL then searches for a feasible successor (FS) and finds one via 10.1.3.3 with a reported distance (RD) of 130816, which is less than the current feasible distance (FD) of 131072. Because a feasible successor exists, DUAL installs the new route without sending queries, confirming option B.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.