Question 193 of 1,000
Computer Forensics Fundamentals and ProcessmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

CHFI Computer Forensics Fundamentals and Process Practice Question

This CHFI practice question tests your understanding of computer forensics fundamentals and process. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO of the following are BEST practices when using a hardware write blocker during forensic acquisition? (Select TWO)

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Test the write blocker on a non-evidence drive before connecting it to the suspect drive

Option A is correct because testing the write blocker on a non-evidence drive verifies that the device is functioning correctly and will not inadvertently allow writes to the suspect drive. This step ensures the integrity of the forensic acquisition by confirming the write blocker's hardware-level protection is operational before it is connected to evidence.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Test the write blocker on a non-evidence drive before connecting it to the suspect drive

    Why this is correct

    Testing ensures the device is working properly.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Use the write blocker to write data to the suspect drive to verify functionality

    Why it's wrong here

    Writing to the suspect drive defeats the purpose of the write blocker.

  • Use the same write blocker for both source and destination drives

    Why it's wrong here

    The write blocker is only needed on the source drive to protect the original.

  • Connect the write blocker between the suspect drive and the forensic workstation

    Why this is correct

    The write blocker is placed in the path to prevent writes to the suspect drive.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Bypass the write blocker if the imaging tool supports software write protection

    Why it's wrong here

    Hardware write blockers provide a higher level of assurance.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may confuse the role of a write blocker as a device that protects both source and destination drives, when in fact it is only used to protect the source (suspect) drive from accidental writes.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Hardware write blockers operate at the ATA/SCSI command level, intercepting and blocking write commands (e.g., WRITE DMA, WRITE SECTOR(S)) while allowing read commands (e.g., READ DMA, IDENTIFY DEVICE) to pass through. In a real-world scenario, if a write blocker is not pre-tested, a faulty unit might pass write commands, leading to evidence contamination that could be challenged in court. The write blocker must be connected in series between the suspect drive and the forensic workstation, ensuring that all data flows through it for command filtering.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CHFI practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CHFI practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CHFI question test?

Computer Forensics Fundamentals and Process — This question tests Computer Forensics Fundamentals and Process — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Test the write blocker on a non-evidence drive before connecting it to the suspect drive — Option A is correct because testing the write blocker on a non-evidence drive verifies that the device is functioning correctly and will not inadvertently allow writes to the suspect drive. This step ensures the integrity of the forensic acquisition by confirming the write blocker's hardware-level protection is operational before it is connected to evidence.

What should I do if I get this CHFI question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CHFI practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CHFI exam.