Question 169 of 1,000
Mobile and Malware ForensicsmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

CHFI Mobile and Malware Forensics Practice Question

This CHFI practice question tests your understanding of mobile and malware forensics. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An analyst is performing dynamic analysis of a malware sample in Cuckoo Sandbox. Which TWO of the following are typical indicators of command and control (C2) communication?

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The malware performs DNS queries to a domain that resolves to a known malicious IP

In dynamic analysis with Cuckoo Sandbox, DNS queries to a domain that resolves to a known malicious IP are a classic indicator of C2 communication because the malware must resolve its command server's address before establishing a channel. Similarly, HTTP POST requests to a very recently registered domain (e.g., 2 days old) are suspicious, as attackers often use fresh domains to evade reputation-based blocklists, and POST is commonly used to exfiltrate data or receive commands.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The malware creates a registry run key for persistence

    Why it's wrong here

    Persistence is different from C2; it ensures survival after reboot.

  • The malware performs DNS queries to a domain that resolves to a known malicious IP

    Why this is correct

    DNS queries to malicious IPs are typical C2 beaconing activity.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The malware modifies system files in C:\Windows\System32

    Why it's wrong here

    File modification could be for persistence or payload, but not specifically C2.

  • The malware creates a mutex named 'Global\MyMutex'

    Why it's wrong here

    Mutex creation is often used to ensure single instance, not C2.

  • The malware makes HTTP POST requests to a domain registered 2 days ago

    Why this is correct

    Recent domain registration combined with HTTP POST is a classic C2 indicator.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

EC-Council often tests the distinction between local host artifacts (persistence, mutexes, file modifications) and network-based C2 indicators, tricking candidates into selecting any suspicious behavior rather than focusing specifically on outbound communication patterns.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

C2 communication often relies on DNS as a first step, where the malware performs a query for a domain that may use fast-flux or domain-generation algorithms (DGAs) to evade static analysis. HTTP POST requests are favored because they can encapsulate encrypted payloads in the request body, mimicking legitimate web traffic, and the use of a domain registered only 2 days ago exploits the 'zero-day' window before threat intelligence feeds update. Under the hood, Cuckoo Sandbox monitors these network calls via API hooking (e.g., WSASend, sendto) and PCAP analysis, flagging anomalies like low TTL values or unusual HTTP headers.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CHFI exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CHFI practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CHFI practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CHFI question test?

Mobile and Malware Forensics — This question tests Mobile and Malware Forensics — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The malware performs DNS queries to a domain that resolves to a known malicious IP — In dynamic analysis with Cuckoo Sandbox, DNS queries to a domain that resolves to a known malicious IP are a classic indicator of C2 communication because the malware must resolve its command server's address before establishing a channel. Similarly, HTTP POST requests to a very recently registered domain (e.g., 2 days old) are suspicious, as attackers often use fresh domains to evade reputation-based blocklists, and POST is commonly used to exfiltrate data or receive commands.

What should I do if I get this CHFI question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CHFI practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CHFI exam.