Question 720 of 1,000
Application, Email and Cloud ForensicshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to check the server's process accounting logs, such as auditd or the output of lastcomm, for PHP process invocation with the cmd parameter. This is correct because process accounting logs capture every executed command at the kernel level, recording the exact binary run (e.g., php-cgi) along with its arguments and timestamps, providing irrefutable evidence that the decoded webshell’s cmd parameter was actually processed by the PHP interpreter. On the CHFI exam, this question tests your understanding of forensic artifacts beyond file presence—webshells can be uploaded but never executed, so confirming execution requires examining system-level logs that track process creation. A common trap is relying solely on Apache access logs, which only show the request, not whether the server ran it. Memory tip: “Process logs prove the process—access logs only show the ask.”

CHFI Application, Email and Cloud Forensics Practice Question

This CHFI practice question tests your understanding of application, email and cloud forensics. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A forensic investigator examining a compromised Linux server finds a base64-encoded string in the Apache access log: 'GET /cgi-bin/test.cgi?cmd=ZWNobyAiPD9waHAgc3lzdGVtKCRfR0VUW2NtZF0pOyA/PiI+...' After decoding, the string contains a PHP webshell. Which of the following is the MOST effective method to confirm the webshell was executed on the server?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Check the server's process accounting logs (e.g., auditd, 'lastcomm') for PHP process invocation with the cmd parameter

To confirm execution, the investigator should examine the server's process history or audit logs (e.g., auditd, bash history) to see if the cmd parameter was processed by the PHP interpreter.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Perform a memory dump of the server and search for the base64 string

    Why it's wrong here

    Memory analysis might reveal remnants, but it is more complex and less direct than checking process logs.

  • Check the server's process accounting logs (e.g., auditd, 'lastcomm') for PHP process invocation with the cmd parameter

    Why this is correct

    Process logs can show that the PHP interpreter ran the cmd parameter, confirming execution.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Analyze the MySQL transaction logs for any database queries triggered by the webshell

    Why it's wrong here

    Webshell execution does not necessarily involve database queries.

  • Search for the decoded PHP code in the web server's document root

    Why it's wrong here

    The webshell might have been written to a file, but execution confirmation requires process or audit logs.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CHFI exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which CHFI exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related CHFI practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CHFI practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CHFI question test?

Application, Email and Cloud Forensics — This question tests Application, Email and Cloud Forensics — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Check the server's process accounting logs (e.g., auditd, 'lastcomm') for PHP process invocation with the cmd parameter — To confirm execution, the investigator should examine the server's process history or audit logs (e.g., auditd, bash history) to see if the cmd parameter was processed by the PHP interpreter.

What should I do if I get this CHFI question wrong?

Identify which CHFI exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More CHFI practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CHFI practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CHFI exam.