Courseiva

CEH Web Application and Injection Attacks Practice Question

Which of the following tools is specifically designed to automate the process of detecting and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities in web applications?

⚠ Common exam trap

EC-Council often tests the distinction between general-purpose security tools (like Burp Suite or Metasploit) and specialized automation tools (like SQLMap), leading candidates to choose a tool they recognize for web testing rather than the one specifically designed for SQL injection automation.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

SQLMap

SQLMap is an open-source penetration testing tool that automates the detection and exploitation of SQL injection flaws. It supports a wide range of database backends and injection techniques, making it the go-to tool for this specific task.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Burp Suite

    Why it's wrong here

    Burp Suite is an interception proxy for manual and semi-automated web testing; its scanner detects injection flaws but does not automate exploitation of SQL injection to extract data. It is tempting because Burp is the standard toolkit for finding SQL injection, which would be the right choice when the goal is discovery rather than exploitation.

  • ✗

    Metasploit

    Why it's wrong here

    Metasploit is an exploitation framework whose modules target known CVEs and services; it does not crawl web forms to discover SQL injection points before exploiting them. It is tempting because Metasploit can deliver SQL injection payloads once a vulnerable parameter is known, which suits post-discovery exploitation rather than detection.

  • ✓

    SQLMap

    Why this is correct

    SQLMap automates detection and exploitation of SQL injection in web applications, fingerprinting the backend DBMS and dumping data via crafted payloads. This directly matches the stem's requirement for a tool specifically built to automate SQL injection detection and exploitation, rather than general web scanners.

  • ✗

    Nmap

    Why it's wrong here

    Nmap performs port scanning, service and version detection, and NSE scripting; it has no built-in capability to detect or exploit SQL injection in web applications. It is tempting because Nmap's scripting engine can probe HTTP services, which would suit host and service enumeration rather than application-layer injection testing.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CEH question from scratch — 913 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CEH practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CEH exam.