Courseiva
Social Engineering and Physical SecurityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CEH Social Engineering and Physical Security Practice Question

Network Topology
Interface:0x4Refer to the exhibit.C:\Users\Admin>ping 10.0.0.1Ping statistics for 10.0.0.1:C:\Users\Admin>arp -aInternet Address Physical Address Type192.168.1.1 aa-bb-cc-11-22-33 dynamic10.0.0.1 aa-bb-cc-11-22-33 dynamic192.168.1.102 dd-ee-ff-44-55-66 dynamic

Refer to the exhibit. A security analyst runs ping and arp commands. What is the most likely attack occurring?

⚠ Common exam trap

Many candidates confuse MAC flooding (which targets switch CAM tables) with ARP spoofing (which targets host ARP caches), but the exhibit's `arp -a` output showing multiple IPs for one MAC is the definitive sign of ARP cache poisoning, not a switch-level attack.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

ARP spoofing attack

The combination of `ping` and `arp` commands reveals an ARP spoofing attack. The `arp -a` output shows the same MAC address (00-11-22-33-44-55) mapped to multiple IP addresses (192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2), which is a classic indicator of ARP cache poisoning. The `ping` commands confirm that both IPs are reachable, but the duplicate MAC entry proves an attacker is intercepting traffic by associating their MAC with multiple IPs.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack

    Why it's wrong here

    A Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack involves overwhelming a target with traffic from numerous compromised systems, aiming to exhaust resources and deny legitimate access. The output of `ping` and `arp -a` primarily reveals network layer connectivity and local address resolution anomalies, respectively. While a DDoS could impact network performance, these commands alone would not directly indicate the distributed nature or sheer volume of traffic characteristic of a DDoS attack, which typically requires traffic analysis or network monitoring tools.

  • MAC flooding attack

    Why it's wrong here

    A MAC flooding attack targets a network switch's Content Addressable Memory (CAM) table, overwhelming it with a large number of fake MAC-address-to-port mappings. This forces the switch to operate in a 'fail-open' mode, behaving like a hub and broadcasting all traffic to all ports, enabling sniffing. However, this attack primarily impacts the switch's internal forwarding logic and would not directly manifest as duplicate MAC addresses for different IP addresses within a host's ARP cache, which is what `arp -a` displays.

  • ARP spoofing attack

    Why this is correct

    An ARP spoofing attack, also known as ARP poisoning, involves an attacker sending forged Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) replies to a target system, associating the attacker's MAC address with the IP address of another legitimate device on the local network. The exhibit's indication of duplicate MAC addresses for different IP addresses in the ARP cache is a definitive symptom of this attack. This allows the attacker to intercept, modify, or drop traffic intended for the legitimate device, effectively performing a man-in-the-middle attack.

  • Ping flood attack

    Why it's wrong here

    A ping flood attack is a basic Denial of Service (DoS) technique where an attacker overwhelms a target with a high volume of ICMP echo requests (pings), consuming bandwidth and system resources. While the exhibit mentions `ping`, the critical evidence for identifying the attack type comes from the `arp -a` output, which shows anomalies in the ARP table. ARP anomalies, such as duplicate MAC addresses for different IPs, are not direct symptoms of a ping flood; they indicate issues with data link layer address resolution, not excessive ICMP traffic.

Quick reference

Access Control Model Comparison

ModelAcronymWho Controls Access?Best For
Discretionary Access ControlDACResource ownerSmall teams, file shares
Mandatory Access ControlMACSystem / security labelsClassified govt / military
Role-Based Access ControlRBACAdministrator (via roles)Enterprise environments
Attribute-Based Access ControlABACPolicy engine (user + resource attributes)Fine-grained, dynamic policies
Rule-Based Access ControlRuBACSystem rules / ACLsFirewall rules, network ACLs

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CEH question from scratch — 870 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CEH practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CEH exam.