Courseiva
Malware, Social Engineering and Network AttackshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CEH Practice Question: Malware, Social Engineering and Network Attacks

During a penetration test, you run the command: 'macof -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.1 -d 192.168.2.1 -e 00:11:22:33:44:55'. What is the intended effect of this command?

⚠ Common exam trap

Test-takers frequently confuse MAC flooding (which targets the switch's CAM table) with ARP poisoning (which targets the ARP cache of hosts), as both involve spoofed MAC addresses but operate at different layers and with different mechanisms.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Perform MAC flooding to cause switch to fail open

The `macof` tool generates a flood of random MAC addresses on the specified interface, overwhelming the switch's Content Addressable Memory (CAM) table. When the CAM table is full, the switch fails open and begins flooding all frames out all ports, effectively turning it into a hub. This allows the attacker to sniff traffic that would normally be isolated to specific switch ports.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Execute a SYN flood against the target

    Why it's wrong here

    macof is a Layer 2 tool designed to generate a large number of random MAC addresses, overwhelming a switch's Content Addressable Memory (CAM) table. A SYN flood, conversely, is a Layer 4 denial-of-service attack that exploits the TCP three-way handshake by sending a flood of SYN requests without completing the final ACK, exhausting server resources. Therefore, macof is not used for executing a SYN flood, which requires tools like hping3 or Nmap's scripting engine.

  • Perform MAC flooding to cause switch to fail open

    Why this is correct

    The command macof -i eth0 specifically performs MAC flooding by continuously sending frames with randomly generated source MAC addresses to exhaust the switch's Content Addressable Memory (CAM) table. When the CAM table overflows, the switch typically enters a "fail-open" mode, behaving like a hub by broadcasting all incoming traffic out of all ports. This allows an attacker connected to any port on the switch to capture and analyze all network traffic, effectively bypassing the switch's normal segmentation.

  • Perform ARP poisoning

    Why it's wrong here

    macof operates by flooding the network with numerous frames containing random source MAC addresses to overwhelm a switch's CAM table. ARP poisoning, on the other hand, involves sending spoofed ARP reply messages to associate an attacker's MAC address with the IP address of another host (like the default gateway or a target server). This redirection of traffic is fundamentally different from macof's Layer 2 table exhaustion technique, which does not manipulate ARP caches.

  • Spoof DNS responses

    Why it's wrong here

    macof is a Layer 2 utility designed to flood a switch's CAM table with random MAC addresses, forcing it into a hub-like state. DNS spoofing, however, is a Layer 7 attack where an attacker intercepts or manipulates DNS queries and responses to redirect users to malicious websites or services. This attack typically involves tools such as dnsspoof or manipulating DNS server entries, which is entirely unrelated to macof's MAC address generation and switch table overflow mechanism.

Quick reference

Access Control Model Comparison

ModelAcronymWho Controls Access?Best For
Discretionary Access ControlDACResource ownerSmall teams, file shares
Mandatory Access ControlMACSystem / security labelsClassified govt / military
Role-Based Access ControlRBACAdministrator (via roles)Enterprise environments
Attribute-Based Access ControlABACPolicy engine (user + resource attributes)Fine-grained, dynamic policies
Rule-Based Access ControlRuBACSystem rules / ACLsFirewall rules, network ACLs

About these practice questions

This CEH question is part of Courseiva's 870-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CEH practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CEH exam.