Question 370 of 1,152
General Security ConceptshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is zero trust, because it directly mitigates the risk that stolen credentials alone can grant persistent access to sensitive data. Unlike a traditional VPN model where a single login creates a trusted session, zero trust mandates continuous re-evaluation of every request, enforcing per-request authorization and micro-segmentation. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this principle tests your understanding of how credential theft exploits implicit trust—a common trap is confusing zero trust with least privilege, which limits permissions but does not re-verify each access attempt. The exhibit’s scenario highlights that a VPN session’s persistent access is the vulnerability, making zero trust the correct choice as it eliminates that persistent trust. Remember the memory tip: “Never trust, always verify—every request, every time.”

SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of general security concepts. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

VPN and application audit
08:04 user rpatel authenticated from home laptop
08:05 VPN tunnel established
08:06 request: GET /finance/q4-forecast.xlsx
08:06 policy: allowed because prior login within 12 hours
08:07 note: device posture not checked; no step-up MFA

Based on the exhibit, which security principle should the team strengthen to reduce the chance that stolen credentials alone provide access to sensitive data?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

VPN and application audit
08:04 user rpatel authenticated from home laptop
08:05 VPN tunnel established
08:06 request: GET /finance/q4-forecast.xlsx
08:06 policy: allowed because prior login within 12 hours
08:07 note: device posture not checked; no step-up MFA

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Zero trust, because every request should be re-evaluated instead of relying on the earlier VPN login.

The exhibit shows a scenario where a VPN session grants persistent access to sensitive data without re-authentication. Zero trust is correct because it mandates continuous verification of every request, not just the initial VPN login, so stolen credentials alone would not provide ongoing access to sensitive data. This principle enforces micro-segmentation and per-request authorization, directly addressing the vulnerability of credential theft.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Least privilege, because the user should only have the minimum file permissions needed.

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege is important, but the exhibit shows the bigger issue is trust being granted after one successful login. The user is not receiving excessive file permissions inside the application; instead, the access decision is too permissive over time and location.

  • Zero trust, because every request should be re-evaluated instead of relying on the earlier VPN login.

    Why this is correct

    Zero trust fits the exhibit because access is being allowed based on an earlier authentication event and network location alone. A zero-trust design would re-evaluate each request using factors such as device health, identity, and context instead of assuming the session is safe for 12 hours.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Need-to-know, because all finance data should be hidden from anyone outside the department.

    Why it's wrong here

    Need-to-know limits information to what a person requires for their role, but the exhibit is focused on stale trust decisions after authentication. The problem is not only who can know the data; it is that the session remains trusted without rechecking the user or device.

  • Defense in depth, because multiple layers are always better than one control.

    Why it's wrong here

    Defense in depth is a valuable design idea, but this exhibit highlights a trust model problem rather than missing layers. The environment already has a VPN and application controls; the weakness is that one login is being treated as sufficient for continued access.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse zero trust with defense in depth, assuming multiple security layers automatically verify every request, when in fact defense in depth can still rely on a single persistent trust decision (like a VPN session) that stolen credentials can exploit.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    Least privilege is important, but the exhibit shows the bigger issue is trust being granted after one successful login. The user is not receiving excessive file permissions inside the application; instead, the access decision is too permissive over time and location.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Zero trust operates on the principle of 'never trust, always verify,' often implemented via technologies like micro-segmentation, identity-aware proxies, and continuous authentication (e.g., using RFC 7519 JSON Web Tokens with short expiry). In practice, this means even after a successful VPN login, each request to a sensitive database must be re-authenticated and authorized, typically through a policy enforcement point (PEP) that checks device posture, user identity, and context. A real-world example is Google's BeyondCorp, which eliminates VPNs entirely and grants access based on real-time device and user trust scores.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security team runs a vulnerability scan on a web application and discovers an unpatched SQL injection flaw. The team prioritises remediation by CVSS score — critical flaws are patched within 24 hours, high within 7 days. Questions like this test whether you understand vulnerability management processes, scanning tools, and remediation prioritisation.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

General Security Concepts — This question tests General Security Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Zero trust, because every request should be re-evaluated instead of relying on the earlier VPN login. — The exhibit shows a scenario where a VPN session grants persistent access to sensitive data without re-authentication. Zero trust is correct because it mandates continuous verification of every request, not just the initial VPN login, so stolen credentials alone would not provide ongoing access to sensitive data. This principle enforces micro-segmentation and per-request authorization, directly addressing the vulnerability of credential theft.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.