Question 303 of 1,152
General Security ConceptshardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is separation of duties and need-to-know, because the finance workflow enforces both principles simultaneously. Separation of duties prevents fraud by dividing payment creation and approval between different roles, ensuring no single employee can complete a fraudulent transaction without collusion. Need-to-know restricts access to only the employee records directly relevant to the assigned finance task, limiting unnecessary exposure of sensitive data. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this combination tests your understanding of how these two principles work together to enforce both process integrity and data confidentiality—a common trap is confusing need-to-know with least privilege, but need-to-know specifically ties access to a defined job function rather than just minimal permissions. Remember the mnemonic: “Split the task, lock the data” to recall that separation of duties divides actions while need-to-know limits visibility.

SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of general security concepts. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

In the finance workflow, one employee can create a payment batch but cannot approve it, and the same person also cannot view employee records that are unrelated to the task. Which two principles are being enforced? Select two.

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Separation of duties, because creation and approval are split between different roles.

Option A is correct because separation of duties is enforced by splitting the payment creation and approval functions between different roles, preventing a single employee from committing fraud by creating and approving a payment without oversight. This principle reduces the risk of unauthorized or malicious actions by requiring collusion for abuse.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Separation of duties, because creation and approval are split between different roles.

    Why this is correct

    Splitting initiation and approval reduces the chance that one person can commit fraud alone.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Need-to-know, because the employee sees only records relevant to the assigned finance task.

    Why this is correct

    Access is limited to information necessary for the job, not to unrelated employee records.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Least privilege, because every user should have no more than one permission overall.

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege is broader than a single-permission rule and is not the specific control being emphasized.

  • Defense in depth, because multiple security technologies are layered around the finance system.

    Why it's wrong here

    No layered technical stack is described; the item focuses on role and information restrictions.

  • Zero trust, because the employee must always be treated as untrusted by the network.

    Why it's wrong here

    Zero trust may influence access design, but the key issue here is role separation and data scoping.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is confusing 'need-to-know' with 'least privilege' — need-to-know limits access to specific data based on job necessity, while least privilege limits the overall permissions (e.g., read vs. write) a user has, and candidates often pick least privilege when the scenario describes data restriction rather than permission minimization.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Separation of duties is a core internal control in financial systems, often implemented through role-based access control (RBAC) where distinct roles (e.g., 'Payment Creator' and 'Payment Approver') are mapped to specific permissions in the application layer. Need-to-know restricts data access based on the principle of least privilege at the data level, commonly enforced via attribute-based access control (ABAC) policies that evaluate user attributes, resource attributes, and environmental conditions before granting access to records.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

General Security Concepts — This question tests General Security Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Separation of duties, because creation and approval are split between different roles. — Option A is correct because separation of duties is enforced by splitting the payment creation and approval functions between different roles, preventing a single employee from committing fraud by creating and approving a payment without oversight. This principle reduces the risk of unauthorized or malicious actions by requiring collusion for abuse.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on SY0-701

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A network team wants no single person to both approve and deploy a production firewall rule, and they also want the approval path to be defensible during an investigation. Which two control concepts best address the stated risk? Select two.

hard
  • A.Separation of duties between the person requesting the change and the person implementing it.
  • B.Dual control requiring a second person to approve the rule.
  • C.Least privilege for the production change account.
  • D.Job rotation for every engineer each quarter.
  • E.Risk transference to the firewall vendor.

Why A: Separation of duties ensures that no single person has the authority to both approve and deploy a production firewall rule, directly addressing the risk of unauthorized or fraudulent changes. By requiring different individuals for the request/approval and implementation steps, the organization creates a clear, auditable chain of accountability that can be defended during an investigation.

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.