Question 693 of 1,152
General Security ConceptshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of general security concepts. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. A key principle to apply: separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process.. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Firewall rule change #4219:
- Requested by: NetworkOps1
- Approved by: NetworkOps1
- Implemented by: NetworkOps1
- Audit note: the same person can create, approve, and deploy production firewall changes.
Proposed redesign:
- Engineer drafts the change.
- Security reviewer approves it.
- A different administrator implements it during a maintenance window.
- The change ticket is visible only to the people assigned to the task.

Based on the exhibit, which security principle is the proposed workflow most directly enforcing?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

Firewall rule change #4219:
- Requested by: NetworkOps1
- Approved by: NetworkOps1
- Implemented by: NetworkOps1
- Audit note: the same person can create, approve, and deploy production firewall changes.
Proposed redesign:
- Engineer drafts the change.
- Security reviewer approves it.
- A different administrator implements it during a maintenance window.
- The change ticket is visible only to the people assigned to the task.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Separation of duties, because no single person can create, approve, and implement the same production change.

The proposed workflow enforces separation of duties by requiring three distinct roles—requester, approver, and implementer—to complete a single firewall change. No single person can both create and approve the change, nor can they implement it without prior approval. This directly prevents any one individual from having end-to-end control over a production change, which is the core of separation of duties.

Key principle: Separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Least privilege, because each person gets only the minimum access needed for the task.

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege is part of the redesign, but it is not the primary principle being enforced by the workflow separation. The audit finding is about one person being able to create, approve, and deploy the same change. The proposed fix is designed mainly to ensure no single person controls the entire process from start to finish.

  • Defense in depth, because multiple layers of security are added around firewall changes.

    Why it's wrong here

    Defense in depth would involve layered technical and administrative controls, such as logging, approvals, and segmentation. While those may exist in the background, the exhibit focuses on dividing duties among different people. The core issue is not the number of layers, but who is allowed to perform each stage of the change process.

  • Separation of duties, because no single person can create, approve, and implement the same production change.

    Why this is correct

    This is the correct principle because the redesign intentionally splits the workflow among different roles. One person drafts the change, another approves it, and a third implements it. That reduces fraud and mistakes by preventing one individual from controlling every step. The limited ticket visibility also supports the same idea, but the central security principle is separation of duties.

    Related concept

    Separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process.

  • Need-to-know, because the ticket is visible only to assigned people.

    Why it's wrong here

    Need-to-know is reflected in the limited ticket visibility, but it is not the main issue highlighted by the audit note. The problem is that one person can request, approve, and deploy the change. The redesign primarily prevents one individual from having excessive control over a sensitive process, which is separation of duties.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse separation of duties with least privilege because both involve limiting actions, but separation of duties specifically divides a process across multiple people, whereas least privilege limits the scope of permissions per person.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Separation of duties is a key internal control in the NIST SP 800-53 framework (AC-5) and is often enforced through change management systems that require distinct digital signatures or approvals at each stage. In a real-world scenario, a firewall engineer could bypass security controls if they could both write and apply a rule without review; splitting the workflow into request, approval, and implementation phases ensures audit trails and prevents unauthorized changes.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process.
  • It reduces the risk of fraud, error, and abuse by requiring multiple people for sensitive tasks.
  • Commonly applied to financial transactions, system changes, and access management.
  • Requires distinct roles for initiation, approval, and execution of a process.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process., then practise related SY0-701 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

General Security Concepts — This question tests General Security Concepts — Separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Separation of duties, because no single person can create, approve, and implement the same production change. — The proposed workflow enforces separation of duties by requiring three distinct roles—requester, approver, and implementer—to complete a single firewall change. No single person can both create and approve the change, nor can they implement it without prior approval. This directly prevents any one individual from having end-to-end control over a production change, which is the core of separation of duties.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Review separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process., then practise related SY0-701 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Separation of duties prevents a single individual from controlling an entire critical process.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.