Question 136 of 1,152
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and MitigationseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of threats, vulnerabilities, and mitigations. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A vulnerability scanner reports a critical issue on a Linux server. The administrator checks the application and confirms the vulnerable package is installed, but the affected feature is not enabled anywhere in production. What should the security team do next?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Validate whether the issue is a false positive or lower-risk finding before prioritizing remediation

Option B is correct because the vulnerability scanner reports a critical issue, but the administrator has confirmed the vulnerable package is installed while the affected feature is not enabled in production. This means the actual risk is lower than the scanner's severity rating, as exploitation requires the feature to be active. The security team should validate whether this is a false positive or a lower-risk finding to prioritize remediation efforts appropriately, ensuring resources are allocated to genuine threats.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Ignore the finding permanently because the package is installed

    Why it's wrong here

    Ignoring the finding without review could miss a real exposure if the feature becomes enabled later.

  • Validate whether the issue is a false positive or lower-risk finding before prioritizing remediation

    Why this is correct

    When scan results do not match actual exposure, the next step is to validate the finding and confirm real risk.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Immediately shut down the server without further investigation

    Why it's wrong here

    Immediate shutdown may be unnecessary and disruptive if the issue is not actually exploitable in production.

  • Apply an exception without documenting any compensating controls

    Why it's wrong here

    Exceptions should be documented and justified; they are not a substitute for confirming the true risk.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates assume any 'critical' scanner finding must be immediately remediated or ignored, failing to recognize that risk assessment requires verifying the actual exploitability in the specific environment.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Vulnerability scanners like Nessus or OpenVAS often use CVSS base scores that assume worst-case exploitation scenarios, but the actual risk depends on the attack surface (e.g., whether the vulnerable service is listening on a network port). In Linux, a package like OpenSSL may be installed for library dependencies, but if the specific vulnerable feature (e.g., TLS 1.0 fallback) is not enabled in configuration files like /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf, the exploit path is blocked. Real-world scenarios include the Heartbleed vulnerability, where many systems had OpenSSL installed but only those running HTTPS services with the heartbeat extension enabled were exploitable.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security team runs a vulnerability scan on a web application and discovers an unpatched SQL injection flaw. The team prioritises remediation by CVSS score — critical flaws are patched within 24 hours, high within 7 days. Questions like this test whether you understand vulnerability management processes, scanning tools, and remediation prioritisation.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — This question tests Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Validate whether the issue is a false positive or lower-risk finding before prioritizing remediation — Option B is correct because the vulnerability scanner reports a critical issue, but the administrator has confirmed the vulnerable package is installed while the affected feature is not enabled in production. This means the actual risk is lower than the scanner's severity rating, as exploitation requires the feature to be active. The security team should validate whether this is a false positive or a lower-risk finding to prioritize remediation efforts appropriately, ensuring resources are allocated to genuine threats.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.