Question 421 of 509
Attacks and ExploitshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is Kerberoasting, which is the correct attack for cracking service account passwords offline after requesting Kerberos service tickets. This technique works because service accounts registered with Service Principal Names (SPNs) in Active Directory have their TGS-REP tickets encrypted using the account’s NTLM hash, allowing an attacker with local administrator access on a domain-joined workstation to extract these tickets using tools like Rubeus or Impacket and crack them offline to reveal the plaintext password. On the CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-002 exam, this question tests your understanding of post-exploitation privilege escalation, often appearing as a scenario where you’ve gained initial foothold and need to move laterally or escalate to Domain Admin. A common trap is confusing Kerberoasting with AS-REP roasting—remember that Kerberoasting targets service tickets (TGS), not authentication requests (AS-REP). Memory tip: “Kerberos tickets for services, crack the hash to get the keys.”

PT0-002 Attacks and Exploits Practice Question

This PT0-002 practice question tests your understanding of attacks and exploits. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

During an internal penetration test, a tester gains access to a domain-joined Windows 10 workstation as a local administrator. The tester wants to escalate privileges to Domain Admin. Which attack involves requesting Kerberos service tickets that can be cracked offline to reveal the plaintext password of a service account?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Kerberoasting

Kerberoasting is the correct attack because it involves requesting Kerberos service tickets (TGS-REP) for service accounts registered with Service Principal Names (SPNs) in Active Directory. These tickets are encrypted with the service account's NTLM hash, which can be cracked offline to reveal the plaintext password. Since the tester has local administrator access on a domain-joined workstation, they can use tools like Rubeus or Impacket to request these tickets without needing domain admin privileges initially.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Pass-the-hash

    Why it's wrong here

    This attack uses captured NTLM hashes to authenticate, not by cracking tickets.

  • Kerberoasting

    Why this is correct

    This attack requests and cracks Kerberos service tickets to obtain service account passwords.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Golden ticket

    Why it's wrong here

    This forges a TGT using the krbtgt hash, allowing domain-wide access, but does not involve cracking.

  • Silver ticket

    Why it's wrong here

    This forges a TGS ticket using a service account hash, but does not involve cracking the hash.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

CompTIA often tests Kerberoasting by contrasting it with pass-the-hash, where candidates mistakenly think pass-the-hash involves cracking hashes offline, but it actually reuses the hash directly for authentication without offline cracking.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, Kerberoasting exploits the fact that service tickets in Kerberos are encrypted with the service account's NTLM hash derived from its password. Tools like Rubeus request TGS-REP packets for SPNs, and the encrypted portion (ciphertext) is extracted for offline brute-forcing with hashcat or John the Ripper. A subtle behavior is that accounts with weak or guessable passwords (e.g., 'Service123') are prime targets, and the attack works even if the service account is not a domain admin—it only needs an SPN set.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related PT0-002 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PT0-002 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PT0-002 question test?

Attacks and Exploits — This question tests Attacks and Exploits — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Kerberoasting — Kerberoasting is the correct attack because it involves requesting Kerberos service tickets (TGS-REP) for service accounts registered with Service Principal Names (SPNs) in Active Directory. These tickets are encrypted with the service account's NTLM hash, which can be cracked offline to reveal the plaintext password. Since the tester has local administrator access on a domain-joined workstation, they can use tools like Rubeus or Impacket to request these tickets without needing domain admin privileges initially.

What should I do if I get this PT0-002 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on PT0-002

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A penetration tester has gained access to a Windows domain and wants to perform a Kerberoasting attack. Which account privileges are required to request service tickets for Kerberoasting?

medium
  • A.Domain Admin
  • B.Any domain user
  • C.Local Administrator on the domain controller
  • D.Enterprise Admin

Why B: Kerberoasting exploits the Kerberos protocol's TGS-REP step, where any domain user can request a service ticket for any service principal name (SPN) in Active Directory. The domain controller returns the ticket encrypted with the service account's NTLM hash, which the attacker can then crack offline. No special privileges beyond being a valid domain user are required because the TGS request is part of normal Kerberos authentication.

Keep practising

More PT0-002 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PT0-002 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PT0-002 exam.