hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

During a penetration test, a tester gains access to a Linux server as a low-privileged user. The server has a cron job that executes a script owned by root but writable by the tester's group. Which privilege escalation technique should the tester use?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

During a penetration test, a tester gains access to a Linux server as a low-privileged user. The server has a cron job that executes a script owned by root but writable by the tester's group. Which privilege escalation technique should the tester use?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Kernel exploit

While kernel exploits can escalate privileges, the scenario does not mention an outdated kernel or available exploit, and the cron vulnerability is directly exploitable.

B

Distractor review

Misconfigured sudo permissions

No sudo configuration or command is mentioned; the tester's group has write access to the script, not sudo privileges.

C

Best answer

Cron job exploitation via script modification

The tester can modify the script that is executed as root by the cron job. When the job runs, the injected code executes with root privileges.

D

Distractor review

Path hijacking in the cron job

Path hijacking would involve replacing a command used in the script, but the script itself is writable, so direct modification is simpler and more reliable.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Related practice questions

Related PT0-002 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PT0-002 question test?

Authentication checks who the user is.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Cron job exploitation via script modification — The scenario describes a perfect condition for cron job exploitation: the script is run by root but the tester can modify it. By injecting malicious commands into the script, the tester will achieve root execution when the cron job runs. Other techniques like kernel exploits or sudo abuse are not indicated.

What should I do if I get this PT0-002 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.