A penetration tester is hired to assess a web application that integrates with a third-party payment API. The client wants the API included in the test but does not have a signed agreement with the vendor. What is the most appropriate action for the tester?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
Best answer
Ask the client to obtain a written authorization from the third-party vendor before testing the API.
This is the proper ethical and legal step to ensure the tester has permission to test the vendor's system.
Distractor review
Proceed with testing the API using anonymous techniques to avoid detection.
Testing without permission is unethical and may be illegal; anonymity does not justify lack of authorization.
Distractor review
Test only the client's application logic but not the actual API endpoint.
This does not meet the client's scope request and may miss vulnerabilities in the integration.
Distractor review
Include the API in the test because the client owns the integration.
Ownership of the integration does not grant permission to test a third-party's infrastructure without their consent.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization
Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Authentication checks who the user is.
- Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
- Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
- AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.
TExam Day Tips
- Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
- Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
- Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.
Related practice questions
Related PT0-002 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A penetration tester is writing the executive summary for a report. The client's CEO needs to understand the business impact of a critical SQL injection vulnerability. Which of the following should the tester include?
Question 2
A penetration tester has gained a low-privileged shell on a Linux server. During enumeration, the tester discovers a binary with the SUID bit set that belongs to root and is known to have a buffer overflow vulnerability. What is the MOST effective next step to escalate privileges?
Question 3
A penetration tester is performing passive reconnaissance against a target domain. Which of the following resources can be used to gather information about the target without directly sending packets to the target's network? (Select two.) (Choose 2.)
Question 4
A penetration tester has obtained a TGT from a domain controller by cracking the krbtgt hash. Which attack can the tester now perform to gain persistent administrative access to any resource in the domain?
Question 5
A penetration tester is writing the executive summary for the final report. The CEO needs to understand the overall risk level and the business impact of the findings. Which of the following should be included in the executive summary?
Question 6
A penetration tester is writing the executive summary of a penetration test report. Which of the following elements is MOST important to include for a non-technical audience?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this PT0-002 question test?
Authentication checks who the user is.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Ask the client to obtain a written authorization from the third-party vendor before testing the API. — The tester must ensure legal and ethical boundaries. Testing a third-party system without explicit permission could violate laws and the vendor's terms of service. The best action is to request the client obtain a written authorization from the vendor, or to exclude the API until such permission is granted. Option A is correct because it addresses the need for legal coverage. Option B (ignoring and testing anyway) is unethical and illegal. Option C (testing only the client's side) might be acceptable but does not fully address the client's request to include the API. Option D (using anonymous techniques) still violates permissions.
What should I do if I get this PT0-002 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.