mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A penetration tester has completed testing and identified several vulnerabilities: a critical SQL injection (CVSS 9.8), a medium stored XSS (CVSS 6.1), and a low self-signed certificate (CVSS 3.7). The client's security manager asks for a simplified way to prioritize remediation. Which of the following is the most effective approach for the tester to present the findings?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A penetration tester has completed testing and identified several vulnerabilities: a critical SQL injection (CVSS 9.8), a medium stored XSS (CVSS 6.1), and a low self-signed certificate (CVSS 3.7). The client's security manager asks for a simplified way to prioritize remediation. Which of the following is the most effective approach for the tester to present the findings?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

List all vulnerabilities in descending order of CVSS score only.

CVSS scores are a useful standard but lack business context. A critical SQL injection might be in a low-impact system, while a medium XSS could affect a high-value customer-facing application. Ordering solely by CVSS may lead to misprioritization.

B

Best answer

Provide a risk matrix that maps likelihood and impact for each finding.

A risk matrix allows the tester to rate each finding based on the likelihood of exploitation and the potential business impact. This gives the client a clear, actionable prioritization that accounts for their specific environment and risk tolerance.

C

Distractor review

Present only the critical SQL injection finding because it overshadows the others.

Omitting medium and low findings is inappropriate. While the critical issue is highest priority, ignoring other vulnerabilities could leave the client exposed to other attack vectors. All findings should be reported with appropriate context.

D

Distractor review

Calculate a single overall risk score for the entire engagement by averaging all CVSS scores.

Averaging CVSS scores dilutes the importance of critical vulnerabilities and can give a false sense of security. It does not help the client prioritize individual remediation actions.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related PT0-002 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PT0-002 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Provide a risk matrix that maps likelihood and impact for each finding. — A risk matrix that maps likelihood and impact for each finding provides a clear, contextual understanding of risk. While CVSS scores are a starting point, they do not account for the specific business context, asset value, or exploitability in the client's environment. Presenting each finding with its own risk level allows the client to prioritize based on the combination of technical severity and business impact.

What should I do if I get this PT0-002 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.