mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A client requests a penetration test that includes both their internal network and a third-party cloud service provider's infrastructure. The cloud provider has not given permission for testing. Which action should the penetration tester take regarding the cloud provider's assets?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A client requests a penetration test that includes both their internal network and a third-party cloud service provider's infrastructure. The cloud provider has not given permission for testing. Which action should the penetration tester take regarding the cloud provider's assets?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Test the cloud assets as part of the engagement because they support the client's business

Testing without authorization from the provider is unauthorized and illegal.

B

Best answer

Exclude the cloud provider's assets from the scope and update the rules of engagement

Assets owned by third parties without their consent must be excluded to remain within legal and ethical boundaries.

C

Distractor review

Test only the client-facing parts of the cloud service

Even client-facing parts are owned by the provider; testing them without permission is still unauthorized.

D

Distractor review

Request the client to sign an additional liability waiver for testing third-party assets

A waiver does not grant permission from the cloud provider; the tester must have explicit authorization from the asset owner.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Related practice questions

Related PT0-002 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PT0-002 question test?

Authentication checks who the user is.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Exclude the cloud provider's assets from the scope and update the rules of engagement — Testing assets without explicit authorization from the owner is illegal and unethical. The scope must be limited to assets that the client has permission to test. Updating the rules of engagement clarifies boundaries. Testing even client-facing parts without permission is unauthorized. Having the client sign a waiver does not grant permission from the provider.

What should I do if I get this PT0-002 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.