Courseiva
mediumMultiple Choice

CV0-004 Practice Question: Is troubleshooting a connectivity issue between…

A cloud engineer is troubleshooting a connectivity issue between two virtual networks in different regions. The engineer has verified that the virtual networks are peered and the routing tables are correct. Which of the following is the MOST likely cause of the issue?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often overlook NSGs and jump to routing or gateway issues, but in a peered VNet scenario with correct routing, NSGs are the primary layer-4 filter that can silently drop traffic.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

A network security group blocking the traffic

Network security groups (NSGs) operate at the subnet or NIC level and can filter traffic between peered virtual networks even when routing is correctly configured. Since the engineer has verified peering and routing tables, the most likely remaining cause is an NSG rule explicitly or implicitly denying the traffic, as NSGs are stateful and evaluated after routing decisions.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Incorrect route tables on the virtual network gateway

    Why it's wrong here

    The stem already states routing tables are correct, so a gateway route-table error contradicts the given evidence. Gateway route tables are the correct focus when traffic traverses a VPN or ExpressRoute gateway rather than direct virtual network peering, which bypasses gateways.

  • ✗

    A physical cable disconnection in the datacenter

    Why it's wrong here

    Cloud providers abstract the physical underlay, so a single cable fault cannot selectively break one peering while other traffic flows; provider redundancy masks it. Physical cabling is the correct consideration for on-premises cross-connects or dedicated interconnect circuits, not provider-managed regional peering.

  • ✓

    A network security group blocking the traffic

    Why this is correct

    Network security groups filter traffic at the subnet or NIC level independently of peering and routing, so a deny rule silently drops packets even when connectivity paths are correct. Inspecting NSG rules on both virtual networks is therefore the most likely explanation for the blocked cross-region traffic.

  • ✗

    Incorrect DNS resolution

    Why it's wrong here

    DNS resolution affects name-to-address mapping, not packet forwarding; if routes and peering are correct, IP-level connectivity still works and name lookups would fail separately. DNS is the right suspect when hosts resolve incorrectly while raw IP reachability succeeds.

Visual reference

192.168.1.0 /24 256 addresses (254 usable) 192.168.1.0 /25 Subnet A 128 addr (126 usable) 192.168.1.128 /25 Subnet B 128 addr (126 usable) Borrowing 1 bit from host portion creates 2 subnets (/25)

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CV0-004 question from scratch — 834 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CV0-004 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CV0-004 exam.