A security operations center (SOC) analyst is tuning a SIEM correlation rule to detect lateral movement using pass-the-hash attacks. The analyst wants to minimize false positives while ensuring detection of true positives. Which approach is most effective for reducing false positives in this scenario?
Trap 1: Alert on any use of NTLM authentication
NTLM is commonly used, leading to many false positives.
Trap 2: Alert on multiple failed logins followed by a successful login from…
This may indicate brute force, not specifically pass-the-hash.
Trap 3: Disable NTLM authentication across the network
This is an extreme measure and not a detection tuning technique.
- A
Alert on any use of NTLM authentication
Why wrong: NTLM is commonly used, leading to many false positives.
- B
Alert on multiple failed logins followed by a successful login from a different workstation
Why wrong: This may indicate brute force, not specifically pass-the-hash.
- C
Disable NTLM authentication across the network
Why wrong: This is an extreme measure and not a detection tuning technique.
- D
Compare authentication events against a baseline of normal user behavior and alert on anomalies
UBA techniques help identify unusual authentication patterns indicative of pass-the-hash.